All 2 Debates between Kate Hollern and Andrew Selous

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Kate Hollern and Andrew Selous
Thursday 17th November 2022

(1 year, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Andrew Selous Portrait Andrew Selous
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I can tell my right hon. Friend, who I know takes a close interest in these matters, that by far the largest share of diocesan expenditure goes on parish clergy, and many diocesan secretaries are reducing central costs to support parish ministry. We should remember that hard-working diocesan staff support parishes, church schools and chaplaincies on vital issues such as safeguarding, vocations, ministry training, youth work and social action, none of which I am sure my right hon. Friend would argue with.

Kate Hollern Portrait Kate Hollern (Blackburn) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I have heard from dozens of voters in Blackburn who will be relying on free voter ID certificates, yet the Government have failed to specify the security features to be included. Can I ask the hon. Member for Lancaster and Fleetwood (Cat Smith), representing the Speaker’s Committee on the Electoral Commission—

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Kate Hollern and Andrew Selous
Tuesday 8th September 2015

(8 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Andrew Selous Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Andrew Selous)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree with my right hon. Friend that what took place was completely unacceptable. I can tell him that very thorough investigations are currently taking place. They have not yet been concluded, although some staff have been suspended. I can also tell him that every governor has been written to in the strongest possible terms and told to take immediate action to ensure all escorts and bed watches are properly conducted.

Kate Hollern Portrait Kate Hollern (Blackburn) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

T7. When the criminal courts charge was introduced, Labour warned that the lack of judicial discretion would result in miscarriages of justice, with people pleading guilty to avoid additional cost. It concerns me that people may be pleading guilty to save money in the short term. That will have a longer term impact on employment opportunities. Does the Minister think that is right and fair?