Information between 19th October 2025 - 8th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 321 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 171 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 322 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 174 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 390 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 317 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 381 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 307 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 313 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 389 Noes - 102 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 150 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 308 Noes - 153 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 155 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 80 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 151 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 311 Noes - 152 |
|
4 Nov 2025 - Supporting High Streets - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 321 |
|
4 Nov 2025 - Welfare Spending - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 403 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Juliet Campbell speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Juliet Campbell contributed 1 speech (71 words) Tuesday 4th November 2025 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
|
Juliet Campbell speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Juliet Campbell contributed 1 speech (71 words) Tuesday 21st October 2025 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Workplace Pensions: Index Linking
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate his Department has made of the number of pensioners who are affected by the absence of statutory indexation on pre-1997 contributions in Broxtowe constituency; and what assessment his Department has made of the potential financial impact of this on pensioners in Broxtowe. Answered by Torsten Bell - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury) The Pensions Regulator has published data which shows that as of March 2023, only 17 per cent of members of private sector defined benefit pension schemes do not receive any pre-1997 indexation. This is available at: https://www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk/en/document-library/research-and-analysis/data-requests#f3a5fe60511a445f91112bd7dd8a64ae
The Department and the Pensions Regulator do not hold this information at a constituency level. |
|
Coronavirus: Vaccination
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, for what reason the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation limited eligibility for covid-19 booster vaccinations; and whether his Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of including unpaid carers under 75 within the eligibility for those vaccinations. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government is committed to protecting those most vulnerable to COVID-19 through vaccination, as guided by the independent Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI). The primary aim of the national COVID-19 vaccination programme remains the prevention of serious illness (hospitalisations and deaths) arising from COVID-19. Population immunity to COVID-19 has been increasing due to a combination of naturally acquired immunity following recovery from infection and vaccine-derived immunity. COVID-19 is now a relatively mild disease for most people, though it can still be unpleasant, with rates of hospitalisation and death from COVID-19 having reduced significantly since COVID-19 first emerged. The focus of the JCVI advised programme has therefore moved towards targeted vaccination of the two groups who continue to be at higher risk of serious disease, including mortality. These are the oldest adults and individuals who are immunosuppressed. On 13 November 2024, JCVI published advice on who should be offered vaccination in autumn 2025. On 26 June 2025, the Government accepted the JCVI’s advice that in autumn 2025, a COVID-19 vaccination should be offered to the following groups:
The Government has no plans to change eligibility for autumn 2025. It has accepted the JCVI advice for this campaign in full. As for all vaccines, the JCVI keeps the evidence under regular review. |
|
Silica
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe) Monday 20th October 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of banning silica. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The merits of banning silica have not been considered as it is a naturally occurring material found in sand, glass, and many rocks and minerals.
Great Britain has a well-established regulatory framework under the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regulations 2002 (as amended), which already require employers to prevent exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS) to protect workers’ health. |
|
Silica
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe) Tuesday 21st October 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will have discussions with the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care on the potential merits of banning silica. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) There are no plans to discuss the merits of banning silica as it is a naturally occurring material found in sand, glass, and many rocks and minerals.
Great Britain has a well-established regulatory framework under the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regulations 2002 (as amended), which already requires employers to prevent exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS) to protect workers’ health. |
|
Rare Diseases: Health Services
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe) Tuesday 21st October 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to support people affected by (a) Fahr's Disease and (b) other genetic, rare and undiagnosed conditions. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government is committed to improving the lives of those living with rare diseases, such as Fahr’s Disease. The United Kingdom Rare Diseases Framework sets out four priorities collaboratively developed with the rare disease community. These include: helping patients get a final diagnosis faster; increasing awareness of rare diseases among healthcare professionals; better coordination of care; and improving access to specialist care, treatments, and drugs. We published the annual England Action Plan in February 2025, where we report on the steps we have taken to advance these priorities in the preceding year and set out three new actions for the year ahead. |
|
Economic Situation: Nottinghamshire
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe) Thursday 6th November 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps she is taking to support the local economy in (a) Broxtowe and (b) Nottinghamshire. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) The government’s approach to regional growth will drive growth in towns, city regions and communities and make the most of the opportunities in each part of the country, to make everyone better off. There is excellence right across the country and this government is backing it: lifting living standards and putting more money in people’s pockets.
The region will benefit from the £2bn investment for the East Midlands Combined County Authority (EMCCA), delivering a new mass transit system to connect Derby and Nottingham. We have also recommitted £160m over 10 years for the East Midlands Investment Zone and confirming support for East Midlands Freeport. Local partners expect the East Midlands Investment Zone to generate £383m in private sector investment and deliver 4,200 jobs.
Further, as announced by the Chancellor at the recent Regional Investment Summit, Homes England will soon launch the procurement for a partner for the Broad Marsh regeneration project in Nottingham city centre, supported by the mayor Claire Ward. |
|
Sudan: Armed Conflict
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe) Thursday 6th November 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what discussions she has had with her international counterparts on the reported massacres in el-Fasher in Sudan. Answered by Chris Elmore - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) I refer the Hon. Member to the response provided to the Urgent Question on Sudan: Protection of Civilians on 30 October. |
|
Small Businesses: Broxtowe
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe) Monday 3rd November 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what steps he is taking to support small business owners in Broxtowe constituency. Answered by Blair McDougall - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) The Government’s Plan for Small Businesses, published in July, sets out the measures that Government is taking to support small businesses across the UK. This includes tackling late payments, boosting access to finance, and removing red tape to enable small businesses, including those in Broxtowe constituency, to grow and thrive. SMEs can access DBT’s wealth of business and export support via business.gov.uk. The Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire Growth Hub is where small and medium businesses in the Broxtowe constituency can benefit from specialist business advice and help on how to grow and access new markets. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
4 Nov 2025, 12:39 p.m. - House of Commons ">> All of this is all of the decisions, Mr. Speaker, in relation to tax will be made at the budget in late November. >> Juliet Campbell. " Dan Tomlinson MP, The Exchequer Secretary (Chipping Barnet, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
4 Nov 2025, 12:39 p.m. - House of Commons ">> Juliet Campbell. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker. In my constituency of. Broxtowe. Clare " Juliet Campbell MP (Broxtowe, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 30th October 2025
Special Report - 6th Special Report - Transnational repression in the UK: Government Response Human Rights (Joint Committee) Found: Conservative; Life peer) Lord Sewell of Sanderstead (Conservative; Life peer) House of Commons Juliet Campbell |
|
Monday 27th October 2025
Report - 8th Report - Proposal for a Remedial Order to amend the Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Immunity Human Rights (Joint Committee) Found: Conservative; Life peer) Lord Sewell of Sanderstead (Conservative; Life peer) House of Commons Juliet Campbell |
|
Friday 24th October 2025
Attendance statistics - Members' Attendance 2024 - 26 (as at 23 July 2025) Human Rights (Joint Committee) Found: Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench, Life peer) (Chair) (added 5 Sep 2024) 27 of 27 (100.0%) Juliet Campbell |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 28th October 2025 9:30 a.m. Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Department and its arm’s-length bodies At 10:00am: Oral evidence Philip Duffy - Chief Executive at Environment Agency Alan Lovell - Chair at Environment Agency View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 5th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 4th November 2025 9:30 a.m. Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025 2 p.m. Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence Subject: Human Rights and the Regulation of AI View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 11th November 2025 2 p.m. Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Department and its arm’s-length bodies At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Emma Reynolds MP - Secretary of State at Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs Emily Miles - Director General for Food, Biosecurity and Trade at Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs David Hill - Director General for Strategy and Water at Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025 2 p.m. Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence Subject: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill: Potential impact on the Human Rights of disabled people At 2:15pm: Oral evidence Prof Liz Wicks - Professor of Human Rights Law at University of Leicester Paul Bowen KC - Barrister at Brick Court Chambers Lord Carlile of Berriew CBE KC - Barrister; Crossbench life peer at House of Lords At 3:15pm: Oral evidence Liz Carr Jean Eveleigh - Patron at My Death, My Decision The Baroness Hollins - Crossbench Life Peer at House of Lords Dr Henry Marsh CBE FRCS View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 18th November 2025 9:30 a.m. Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Climate and weather resilience At 10:00am: Oral evidence Karen Thomas - Head of Coastal Management at East Suffolk Council Natasha Dix - Service Director for Waste, Environment and Planning at Isle of Wight Council Rob Goodliffe - Coastal Transition Manager at North Norfolk District Council Richard Jackson - Coastal Change Manager at East Riding of Yorkshire Council At 11:10am: Oral evidence Julie Foley - Director of FCERM Strategy and Adaptation at Environment Agency Jaap Flikweert - Coastal representative, Anglian Eastern RFCC, and Flood and Coastal Management Advisor at Haskoning View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025 2 p.m. Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
30 Oct 2025
Legislative Scrutiny: Northern Ireland Troubles Bill Human Rights (Joint Committee) (Select) Not accepting submissions The Northern Ireland Troubles Bill was introduced into the House of Commons on 14 October 2025 and is intended to repeal and replace various aspects of the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023, as well as to reform and supplement the wider approach of dealing with the legacy of the Troubles. The Joint Committee on Human Rights is scrutinising the Bill’s compatibility with human rights. The Government also laid its draft remedial order concerning Northern Ireland legacy on 14 October 2025 and the Joint Committee on Human Rights is scrutinising that remedial order separately. |