Information between 14th October 2026 - 24th October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 114 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - MOD Bicester and Illegal Migrants - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 309 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Inheritance Tax - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 291 |
|
15 Oct 2026 - Highways (Financing) Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 228 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 231 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 178 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 330 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 336 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 329 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 328 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 319 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 327 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 327 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Programme) (No.2) - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 331 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 327 |
|
21 Oct 2026 - Railways - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108 |
|
21 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 111 |
|
21 Oct 2026 - Support for Farmers - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 278 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 279 |
|
21 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland - View Vote Context Juliet Campbell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Juliet Campbell speeches from: Community Policing: Government Support
Juliet Campbell contributed 1 speech (302 words) Wednesday 21st October 2026 - Westminster Hall Home Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Social Services
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe) Thursday 15th October 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether free at the point of use care under the proposed National Care Service will apply to (a) adults under the age of 65 with assessed care needs, and (b) whether the entitlement will cover accommodation and living costs, in addition to personal care. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) Baroness Casey has made clear that one of the core purposes of the Big Conversation on Care that she is leading is to hear from people, families, carers, and others with direct, real-life experience of the current social care system, so she can reflect those experiences in her recommendations for reform. That will include individuals aged under 65 years old in need of care, and the individuals caring for them. The Government will wait for the outcome of Baroness Casey’s review before taking any final decisions. |
|
Dyslexia
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe) Monday 19th October 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment the Department has made of the potential impact of late or absent identification of dyslexia on the mental health and wellbeing of children and young people. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) Effective timely identification and intervention is critical in improving the outcomes of children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities. We recognise that special educational needs do not always become apparent in the early years of education, and that needs can emerge, change or become more visible during adolescence as social, emotional and academic demands increase The Code of Practice makes it clear that we expect teachers to monitor the progress of all pupils and put support in place where needed. Access to targeted educational support should not be dependent on a child or young person having a diagnosis. Instead, evidence-based support should be put in place at the earliest possible point following the identification of a need. This is to ensure that children and young people do not miss out on high-quality teaching and support, which limits progress, confidence, independence, and future life chances. To support settings, we are strengthening the evidence base of what works to improve timely identification in mainstream settings. The department has appointed an independent expert panel to develop the National Inclusion Standards that set out evidence-informed tools, strategies and approaches for educators to draw on to identify and support children and young people with additional needs. We are clear that education settings have an ongoing and important role to play in promoting and supporting the mental health and wellbeing of their pupils. |
|
Young People: Neurodiversity
Asked by: Juliet Campbell (Labour - Broxtowe) Monday 19th October 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to support local authorities to develop coordinated pathways into education, training and employment for neurodivergent young people. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The government is committed to ensuring neurodivergent young people and those with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) have clear, coordinated pathways into education, training and employment. Local authorities have statutory responsibilities to support participation and effective preparation for adulthood. Through SEND reforms, the department is strengthening transitions between education and adult life, improving information sharing and supporting pathways including apprenticeships and Supported Internships. Youth Guarantee Trailblazers are testing approaches for young people at risk of becoming NEET. The Post-16 Education and Skills White Paper complements this by strengthening local coordination across skills, employment, health and transport. Post-16 qualification reforms will provide clearer, inclusive routes into further study, apprenticeships and skilled employment, with providers able to tailor support to individual needs. We are also developing technical education routes from age 14, working with Strategic Authorities to create a consistent national framework that can respond to local labour market needs and growth priorities. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 2nd November Juliet Campbell signed this EDM as a sponsor on Monday 2nd November 2026 8 signatures (Most recent: 3 Nov 2026) Tabled by: Chris Webb (Labour - Blackpool South) That this House expresses its profound sadness at the death of Sir Patrick Stewart, aged 86; pays tribute to his extraordinary career spanning more than six decades across theatre, television and film; recognises his immense contribution to British acting, from his distinguished performances with the Royal Shakespeare Company to his … |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Community Policing: Government Support
63 speeches (9,502 words) Wednesday 21st October 2026 - Westminster Hall Home Office Mentions: 1: Sarah Jones (Lab - Croydon West) Friend the Member for Broxtowe (Juliet Campbell), I say that I spoke to the deputy chief constable following - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 18th September 2026
Report - 2nd Report - The future of Thames Water and special administration Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Found: Liberal Democrat; Orkney and Shetland) (Chair) Sarah Bool (Conservative; South Northamptonshire) Juliet Campbell |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 4th November 2026
Report - Works of Art Annual Report 2025-26 Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art |