Business of the House Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Leader of the House

Business of the House

Julian Smith Excerpts
Thursday 7th February 2013

(11 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Julian Smith Portrait Julian Smith (Skipton and Ripon) (Con)
- Hansard - -

May we have a debate about Leicester’s historically dodgy, bogus and arrogant claim on Richard III and why north Yorkshire is the only place that he should be returned to, according to his wishes?

Lord Lansley Portrait Mr Lansley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend knows that the legal position is straightforward. The licence gives to the university of Leicester an obligation, but also discretion as to the choice of location for the interment of Richard III’s remains, but there will be other claims. I completely understand the claims of both Westminster abbey in relation to the burial of Anne Neville, and York minster.