Information between 5th February 2026 - 7th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Josh Dean voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116 |
|
10 Feb 2026 - Draft Scotland Act 1998 (Modification of Schedule 5) Order 2026 - View Vote Context Josh Dean voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 14 Noes - 3 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Josh Dean voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 272 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 90 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Josh Dean voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 272 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 143 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Josh Dean voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 107 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Josh Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 73 Noes - 286 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Josh Dean voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 361 Noes - 84 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Josh Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 156 Noes - 273 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Josh Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 280 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context Josh Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 270 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 272 |
|
24 Feb 2026 - Online Harm: Child Protection - View Vote Context Josh Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 272 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 279 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Josh Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 327 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Josh Dean speeches from: Business of the House
Josh Dean contributed 1 speech (84 words) Thursday 5th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Visas: Turkey
Asked by: Josh Dean (Labour - Hertford and Stortford) Wednesday 18th February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the proposed retrospective changes to settlement requirements for European Communities Association Agreement visa holders on levels of migration for each of the next five years. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The earned settlement model, proposed in ’A Fairer Pathway to Settlement’, was subject to a 12 week public consultation, which closed on 12 February 2026. The consultation sought views on whether there should be transitional arrangements for those already on a pathway to settlement, such as those currently on European Communities Association Agreement (ECAA) visas. In the meantime, the current rules for settlement under the ECAA route will continue to apply. We will continue to meet our international obligations. Details of the earned settlement model will now be finalised following the consultation and will be subject to economic and equality impact assessments, which we have committed to publish in due course. |
|
Visas: Turkey
Asked by: Josh Dean (Labour - Hertford and Stortford) Wednesday 18th February 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made with Cabinet colleagues of the economic contribution to the UK of (a) holders of European Communities Association Agreement Turkish Businessperson visas and (b) their businesses in the UK. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The earned settlement model, proposed in ’A Fairer Pathway to Settlement’, was subject to a 12 week public consultation, which closed on 12 February 2026. The consultation sought views on whether there should be transitional arrangements for those already on a pathway to settlement, such as those currently on European Communities Association Agreement (ECAA) visas. In the meantime, the current rules for settlement under the ECAA route will continue to apply. We will continue to meet our international obligations. Details of the earned settlement model will now be finalised following the consultation and will be subject to economic and equality impact assessments, which we have committed to publish in due course. |
|
Young People: Finance
Asked by: Josh Dean (Labour - Hertford and Stortford) Monday 2nd March 2026 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what discussions she had with Cabinet colleagues on the implementation of the National Youth Strategy. Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) On 10th December 2025, we published ‘Youth Matters’, the first cross-government Strategy for young people in England in 15 years. Backed by £500m of DCMS funding over the next 3 years, the Strategy will ensure every young person has somewhere to go, someone who cares for them and a community they feel part of. We regularly engaged with Cabinet colleagues to develop the Strategy and are continuing to work closely to ensure successful delivery and sharing of evidence, including through interministerial meetings on the Young Futures Hubs and a thematic Value for Money review to better align government youth provision spending with the Strategy. |