Information between 29th June 2025 - 19th July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
30 Jun 2025 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 4 |
|
1 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 42 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 328 |
|
1 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour Aye votes vs 49 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 260 |
|
2 Jul 2025 - Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 9 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 385 Noes - 26 |
|
2 Jul 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 158 |
|
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 340 |
|
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 346 |
|
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 415 Noes - 98 |
|
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 338 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour No votes vs 47 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 334 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 35 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 130 Noes - 443 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour Aye votes vs 47 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 242 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 416 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 356 Labour No votes vs 8 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 35 Noes - 469 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 401 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 330 Labour Aye votes vs 37 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 135 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 364 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 370 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Welfare Spending - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 344 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 440 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Jonathan Hinder voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 342 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Jonathan Hinder speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Jonathan Hinder contributed 1 speech (33 words) Tuesday 8th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
|
Jonathan Hinder speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Jonathan Hinder contributed 1 speech (72 words) Monday 7th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Home Office |
|
Jonathan Hinder speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Jonathan Hinder contributed 2 speeches (107 words) Thursday 3rd July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Puberty Suppressing Hormones: Young People
Asked by: Jonathan Hinder (Labour - Pendle and Clitheroe) Monday 7th July 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what progress has been made by the expert panel of clinical specialists on its review of the harms caused to young people by the provision of unregulated cross-sex hormones by private providers; and what his expected timetable is for publication of the panel's report. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government is continuing its work with the National Health Service to reform gender services, to ensure young people receive timely, holistic care and support, while reviewing the use of cross-sex hormones in line with recommendation eight of the Cass Review.
The Cass Review said that NHS England should review its policy on cross-sex hormones. The review noted that the option to provide cross-sex hormones is available for patients aged 16 years old and over, but that “extreme caution” was recommended along with a “strong clinical rationale for providing hormones before the age of 18”. In line with Dr Cass’s recommendations, every case for treatment is now discussed by a national multi-disciplinary team, and NHS England is reviewing its clinical commissioning policy on cross-sex hormones. A public consultation on the evidence is anticipated to take place this summer, and an updated policy is expected to be in place by April 2026.
With regard to private prescribing, a working group has been established by NHS England to provide advice to Government officials and the Chief Pharmaceutical Officer. The remit of the working group is to provide practical advice on the operational consequences of introducing any restrictions on private prescribing and advice on how to manage any risks to patients. The working group is made up of consultant endocrinologists, pharmacy and primary care leads, and national commissioners.
It is not the working group's role to decide whether restrictions on private prescribing should, or should not, be introduced. Neither is the group providing advice on the future use of cross-sex hormones by NHS clinicians. The Department will use the outputs of the working group to inform ongoing policy development. |
| Bill Documents |
|---|
|
Jun. 18 2025
All proceedings up to 18 June 2025 at Report Stage Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26 Bill proceedings: Commons Found: Tonia Antoniazzi Tracy Gilbert Jo White Kirsteen Sullivan Mrs Sharon Hodgson Johanna Baxter Jonathan Hinder |