Public Spending Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Public Spending

Jon Trickett Excerpts
Thursday 17th June 2010

(14 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Danny Alexander Portrait Danny Alexander
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right. If there had been a spending review, we would not be in this position now. As it is, out of the £34 billion of commitments that the previous Government made in that period, we have had to cancel £2 billion and put £9 billion into the spending review. The choice is obvious: profligacy on the one side, responsibility on the other.

Jon Trickett Portrait Jon Trickett (Hemsworth) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

There will be fury in Wakefield and my constituency, where people are expecting schools to be rebuilt and where we absolutely must have the 70 additional hospital beds to make proper provision. Any cancelled patient operations as a result of today’s decisions will be laid entirely at the right hon. Gentleman’s door. His party have joined with the other coalition party in being the party of mass unemployment. Some 300,000 building workers are already out of work. What is his estimate of the increased unemployment that he will produce as a result of his statement today?

Danny Alexander Portrait Danny Alexander
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I understand that some of these decisions are difficult for communities and that there will be genuine anger, which the hon. Gentleman has expressed. However, that anger should be directed at those on his own Front Bench who took irresponsible decisions that could not be afforded. We are now putting that matter right.