Information between 27th February 2026 - 9th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 161 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 41 Noes - 181 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 143 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 139 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 142 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 140 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 142 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 143 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 178 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 71 Noes - 177 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 121 Noes - 145 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Defence: Procurement
Asked by: Lord Spellar (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 4th March 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the Executive Order “Prioritizing the warfighter in defense contracting”, published by the President of the United States of America on 7 January; and whether a similar decision in respect of stock buybacks and excessive corporate distributions would be appropriate for UK Defence procurement. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Executive Order highlighted by the noble Lord outlines potential actions placed upon contractors deemed to be underperforming by the United States Government. Under the Procurement Act 2023, which came into force on February 24 2025, the UK Government has similarly strengthened its ability to take action against underperforming suppliers through a more centralized, transparent system.
Under the Procurement Act 2023 (the Act) the UK Government has strengthened its ability to deal with underperforming suppliers. The Act introduced commercial levers to manage systemic underperformance via an expanded exclusions regime. This regime ensures that a suppliers’ historic conduct, including poor performance, breaches of contract or serious misconduct, can be assessed and addressed appropriately. Discretionary exclusion grounds allow contracting authorities to take proportionate action where suppliers have demonstrated significant or persistent poor performance, including any self-cleaning demonstrated by the supplier. Where a supplier is an excluded or excludable supplier, the Ministry of Defence (MOD) must or may restrict their participation in future competitions, depending on the nature of the exclusion, and in the most serious cases a Minister of the Crown may place a supplier on the debarment list, following investigation. This creates a transparent, consistent approach to managing poor performance risk across MOD and wider Government.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
3 Mar 2026, 2:50 p.m. - House of Lords " Conservative, conservative Lord >> Conservative, conservative Lord Spellar Defence Industrial Strategy will have no economic effect. What might make an impact is a defence " Lord Stirrup (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Thursday 26th March 2026 10:30 a.m. National Resilience Committee - Oral evidence Subject: National Resilience View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Thursday 19th March 2026 10:30 a.m. National Resilience Committee - Oral evidence Subject: National Resilience View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 26th February 2026
Formal Minutes - Minutes of the second meeting, 26 February 2026 National Resilience Committee |
|
Thursday 5th March 2026
Formal Minutes - Minutes of the third meeting, 5 March 2026 National Resilience Committee |
|
Thursday 12th March 2026
Oral Evidence - National Audit Office, National Audit Office, Resilience Academy, and Local Government Association National Resilience - National Resilience Committee |
|
Thursday 12th March 2026
Oral Evidence - Resilience First, and Confederation of British Industry National Resilience - National Resilience Committee |
|
Thursday 19th March 2026
Written Evidence - Emerging Risks Global NLR0002 - National Resilience National Resilience - National Resilience Committee |
|
Thursday 19th March 2026
Written Evidence - Safer Spaces For All CIC NLR0001 - National Resilience National Resilience - National Resilience Committee |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
27 Jan 2026
National Resilience National Resilience Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions No description available |