Lord Spellar Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Spellar

Information between 27th February 2026 - 9th March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 161 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 41 Noes - 181
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 143
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 139
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 142
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 140
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 142
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 140
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 140
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 155
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 143
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 140
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 155
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 156 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 178
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 71 Noes - 177
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 121 Noes - 145


Written Answers
Defence: Procurement
Asked by: Lord Spellar (Labour - Life peer)
Wednesday 4th March 2026

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the Executive Order “Prioritizing the warfighter in defense contracting”, published by the President of the United States of America on 7 January; and whether a similar decision in respect of stock buybacks and excessive corporate distributions would be appropriate for UK Defence procurement.

Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence)

The Executive Order highlighted by the noble Lord outlines potential actions placed upon contractors deemed to be underperforming by the United States Government. Under the Procurement Act 2023, which came into force on February 24 2025, the UK Government has similarly strengthened its ability to take action against underperforming suppliers through a more centralized, transparent system.

Under the Procurement Act 2023 (the Act) the UK Government has strengthened its ability to deal with underperforming suppliers. The Act introduced commercial levers to manage systemic underperformance via an expanded exclusions regime. This regime ensures that a suppliers’ historic conduct, including poor performance, breaches of contract or serious misconduct, can be assessed and addressed appropriately. Discretionary exclusion grounds allow contracting authorities to take proportionate action where suppliers have demonstrated significant or persistent poor performance, including any self-cleaning demonstrated by the supplier. Where a supplier is an excluded or excludable supplier, the Ministry of Defence (MOD) must or may restrict their participation in future competitions, depending on the nature of the exclusion, and in the most serious cases a Minister of the Crown may place a supplier on the debarment list, following investigation. This creates a transparent, consistent approach to managing poor performance risk across MOD and wider Government.




Lord Spellar mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

3 Mar 2026, 2:50 p.m. - House of Lords
" Conservative, conservative Lord >> Conservative, conservative Lord Spellar Defence Industrial Strategy will have no economic effect. What might make an impact is a defence "
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript



Lord Spellar - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Thursday 26th March 2026 10:30 a.m.
National Resilience Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: National Resilience
View calendar - Add to calendar
Thursday 19th March 2026 10:30 a.m.
National Resilience Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: National Resilience
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Thursday 26th February 2026
Formal Minutes - Minutes of the second meeting, 26 February 2026

National Resilience Committee
Thursday 5th March 2026
Formal Minutes - Minutes of the third meeting, 5 March 2026

National Resilience Committee
Thursday 12th March 2026
Oral Evidence - National Audit Office, National Audit Office, Resilience Academy, and Local Government Association

National Resilience - National Resilience Committee
Thursday 12th March 2026
Oral Evidence - Resilience First, and Confederation of British Industry

National Resilience - National Resilience Committee
Thursday 19th March 2026
Written Evidence - Emerging Risks Global
NLR0002 - National Resilience

National Resilience - National Resilience Committee
Thursday 19th March 2026
Written Evidence - Safer Spaces For All CIC
NLR0001 - National Resilience

National Resilience - National Resilience Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
27 Jan 2026
National Resilience
National Resilience Committee (Select)
Not accepting submissions

No description available