Information between 18th April 2026 - 28th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 169 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 144 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 158 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 180 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 151 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 150 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 148 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 146 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 207 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 143 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 141 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 145 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 144 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 144 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 145 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 5 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 165 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Spellar voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 129 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Spellar speeches from: Student Visas
Lord Spellar contributed 1 speech (95 words) Monday 27th April 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
| Written Answers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Courts: West Midlands
Asked by: Lord Spellar (Labour - Life peer) Monday 27th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government how many crown courts and magistrates’ courts there are in each of the boroughs in West Midlands County; and what is the case backlog in each of those courts. Answered by Baroness Levitt - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) Table 1 - Crown Court open cases in West Midlands by court (December 2025)
Table 2 - Magistrates’ courts open cases in West Midlands by court (December 2025)
notes 1) Open cases are those without a final result record. At the Crown Court this excludes cases where one or more defendants is absent and have a live bench warrant. 3) * signifies magistrates’ courts which have permanently closed. Open cases for these courts will have been transferred to other courts but workload will continue to be reported under the initial location. The Crown Court backlog currently stands at over 80,000 cases and, without decisive action, would rise to 100,000 by 2028. Behind each of those cases is someone awaiting justice – defendants seeking to clear their name and victims putting their lives on hold. The record and rising Crown Court caseload means that thousands of victims and witnesses are waiting years for their day in court. Justice delayed is justice denied and the status quo is unacceptable. That is why we asked Sir Brian Leveson, one of our most distinguished judges, to conduct an independent review of the criminal justice system and make recommendations for the modernisation of the system and ways to tackle the backlog. His expert panel gathered evidence over many months. They concluded that reform is essential alongside additional investment in sitting days and the workforce, and a programme of efficiencies. Part 1 of the Review set out a blueprint for pragmatic structural reform in our criminal courts and made clear that action across all aspects of the criminal justice process is needed. Reform, investment and modernisation are all necessary to ensure that our courts deliver justice effectively and efficiently. The Government has already invested significantly in the system – in record sitting days (increasing judicial capacity), court buildings and technology, and in legal professionals with significant investment in legal aid. However, these investments in growing the workforce, whilst vital, will take years to take effect. The Government is committed to doing whatever is necessary to deliver swifter justice for victims. Only by pulling every lever we have – investment, efficiency and reform – can we turn the tide on the backlog and begin to deliver faster and fairer justice. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Police: Body Armour
Asked by: Lord Spellar (Labour - Life peer) Monday 27th April 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the current specifications for police body armour, with regard to (1) protection against ballistics, and (2) long term stress injuries arising from design and weight. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) Home Office body armour standards, including for ballistic protection, are developed using expert scientific advice and in line with police operational requirements to ensure that body armour does not place an unnecessary burden on officers while protecting them. Body armour certified to Home Office standards is rigorously and independently tested to ensure it meets the highest safety standards, based on operational requirements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
UK Border Force: Shipping
Asked by: Lord Spellar (Labour - Life peer) Friday 24th April 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what is the current position of the contract for the new vessels for UK Border Force. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) I refer my noble friend to the answer to question HL14258 tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Beamish, on 4th February 2026. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Government Departments: Poultry
Asked by: Lord Spellar (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 28th April 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what is their procurement policy regarding priority for British produced chicken in food and catering contracts. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government is open to considering all lawful means of achieving its ambition that half of all food purchased across the public sector should be locally produced or certified to higher environmental standards.
The Government wants British farmers and producers to be well‑placed to bid for a fair share of the £5 billion spent each year on public sector food and catering contracts.
The Government has already published a new national procurement policy statement. It sets expectations for Government contracts to favour products certified to high environmental standards that we think high-quality British producers are well-placed to meet.
Given the limited information on the origin and sustainability of food in the public sector supply chain, Defra has begun collecting new data to understand how far public sector settings are serving food, including chicken, from local and sustainable sources and what further action is needed. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
23 Apr 2026, 1:20 p.m. - House of Lords "this, first of all, to pay tribute to my colleague Lord Spellar, who originally introduced the private member's bill successfully many " Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
23 Apr 2026, 1:20 p.m. - House of Lords "was a welcome step forward. But I think even at the time Lord Spellar, I remember saying to me, this will " Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
23 Apr 2026, 1:04 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Spellar Lord Brennan and the noble Lords Lord Freyberg and the Earl of Clancarty for their insight " Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
85 speeches (14,315 words) Consideration of Lords message Monday 27th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Lewis Atkinson (Lab - Sunderland Central) national planning policy framework in 2018, following a private Member’s Bill secured by the now Lord Spellar—MP - Link to Speech |
|
English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
77 speeches (15,626 words) Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons Thursday 23rd April 2026 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Lab - Life peer) I thank the noble Baroness, as well as my noble friends Lady McIntosh, Lady Keeley, Lord Spellar and - Link to Speech 2: Lord Brennan of Canton (Lab - Life peer) I pay tribute to my colleague, the noble Lord, Lord Spellar, who originally introduced the successful - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 16th April 2026
Oral Evidence - Government Cyber Unit, and Accenture National Resilience - National Resilience Committee Found: Hunter of Auchenreoch; Lord Marland; Baroness Mobarik; Baroness Northover; Lord Oates; Lord Peach; Lord Spellar |