All 3 Debates between John Slinger and Judith Cummins

Grenfell Tower Inquiry

Debate between John Slinger and Judith Cummins
Monday 2nd December 2024

(2 weeks, 6 days ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Slinger Portrait John Slinger (Rugby) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I strongly welcome the Deputy Prime Minister’s statement, which shows that she cares and is resolute in seeking redress. The essence of how our country is run with regard to public safety is at stake, so I hope my right hon. Friend and other hon. Members will agree that, for public confidence and for the deterrent effect to grow, not only must we ensure that justice is not denied by being delayed; it is also for us to ensure that justice—in the form of individuals, organisations and companies being properly held to account—happens at all. That is important because, as other hon. Members have alluded to, in previous cases of egregious state and business failure, there has been insufficient justice of this kind. We owe this to the Grenfell victims, to the survivors and indeed to wider society.

Judith Cummins Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I call the shadow Minister.

House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

Debate between John Slinger and Judith Cummins
John Slinger Portrait John Slinger (Rugby) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for giving way in his entertaining speech. He makes several references to our manifesto, but I would like to make some references to the Conservative party’s manifesto—

Judith Cummins Portrait The First Deputy Chairman of Ways and Means (Judith Cummins)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. I hope the hon. Member’s intervention is on the House of Lords and within the scope of the Bill.

John Slinger Portrait John Slinger
- Hansard - -

It is related to references to reform of the House of Lords. There are no references to reform of the House of Lords in the Conservative party’s manifesto. There is one reference to peers but not to peers in the other place, and there are a few references to the constitution but not to our unwritten constitution. Will the right hon. Gentleman tell the House why he is now so fascinated by these measures?

Infected Blood Inquiry

Debate between John Slinger and Judith Cummins
Friday 26th July 2024

(4 months, 3 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Judith Cummins Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Judith Cummins)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I call John Slinger to ask the last question.

John Slinger Portrait John Slinger (Rugby) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker, and congratulations on your elevation to your position. Does my right hon. Friend agree that the public note that all too often in such cases of egregious state failure, prosecutions do not follow? It appears to the public that there is, in some ways, impunity. Compensation is belatedly given; reforms are made; but all too often individuals are not held accountable. That is part of the problem that we are discussing this morning. Will he commit to giving further updates on the steps that may be taken to ensure that individuals are held properly accountable?