Further Education Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Education

Further Education

John Redwood Excerpts
Wednesday 18th November 2015

(8 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Redwood Portrait John Redwood (Wokingham) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Lady give way?

Lucy Powell Portrait Lucy Powell
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No. I am going to make some progress.

High-wage, highly skilled and more productive economies have high levels of attainment and investment in 16-to-19 education. International evidence tells us that investing in the literacy and numeracy of students in post-16 education is directly linked to higher productivity, and research shows that the economic returns from investing in 16-to-19 education exceed £20 for every £1 spent.

John Redwood Portrait John Redwood
- Hansard - -

What did the hon. Lady learn from the very high levels of youth unemployment that we saw in 2009-10, when Labour left office, and why were people unable to secure apprenticeships then? [Interruption.]

--- Later in debate ---
John Redwood Portrait John Redwood
- Hansard - -

The Opposition were making the case that our colleges are not giving enough contact hours to students, which was a surprising criticism. Will the Secretary of State confirm that, when students undertake advanced level studies, they need time for private reading, research, writing and problem solving as well as time with teachers? I presume that that is what our colleges are doing.

Baroness Morgan of Cotes Portrait Nicky Morgan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right. Young people, post-16, will have a mixture of face-to-face tuition, study in smaller groups, study in larger groups and their own study time, which prepares them for the next stage. The funding that colleges receive is for 600 hours, which enables them to teach a number of A-levels or technical qualifications.