Information between 17th November 2025 - 27th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 318 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 318 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 327 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 105 |
|
19 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 80 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 92 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 318 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 320 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 179 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 98 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 320 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
John Lamont speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
John Lamont contributed 2 speeches (119 words) Monday 17th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Home Office |
|
John Lamont speeches from: Parkinson’s Disease
John Lamont contributed 1 speech (278 words) Monday 17th November 2025 - Westminster Hall Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Eskdalemuir Seismological Array
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps he is taking to ensure that national security is prioritised in discussions on the future of the Eskdalemuir Seismological Array. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Ministry of Defence (MOD) is committed to safeguarding the Eskdalemuir Seismic Array, recognising its critical role in national and global security.
MOD officials regularly engage with the Department of Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) and the Scottish Government to ensure that the Array’s capabilities are not affected by future wind energy deployment in the 50km zone of interest.
As a member of the DESNZ-chaired Eskdalemuir Working Group, the MOD continues to advocate for the protection of the Array, with all stakeholders aligned on its importance and the need for its safeguarding. |
|
Eskdalemuir Seismological Array
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what (a) discussions and (b) meetings officials in his Department have had with the Eskdalemuir Working Group on the Eskdalemuir Seismological Array. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Eskdalemuir Working Group (EWG) members include the Ministry of Defence (MOD), the Scottish Government, and representatives from local planning authorities and the wind industry.
The EWG meets regularly, with the last meeting taking place on 3 September 2025. |
|
Eskdalemuir Seismological Array
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what (a) discussions and (b) meetings officials in his Department have had with Xi Engineering on the Eskdalemuir Seismological Array. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Ministry of Defence (MOD) engages with Xi Engineering through the Eskdalemuir Working Group (EWG), chaired by the Department of Energy Security and Net Zero, which includes the MOD, Scottish Government, local planning authorities and the wind industry. |
|
Eskdalemuir Seismological Array
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether the Eskdalemuir Working Group will prioritise (a) the maintenance of national security and (b) international defence obligations when considering any new (i) regime and (ii) methodology for measuring seismic interference within the safety zone around the Eskdalemuir Seismological Array. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) We recognise and are aware of the interference that onshore wind turbines can cause to seismological monitoring stations, and the subsequent safeguarding concerns that operators of seismological arrays can have. We are working closely with the Ministry of Defence to bring forward a resolution to this issue, via the Eskdalemuir Working Group. We are clear that the Eskdalemuir Seismic Array is a key piece of defence infrastructure that is part of international monitoring networks and that any updated approach to managing onshore wind deployment near the Array will not compromise its detection capabilities. |
|
Eskdalemuir Seismological Array
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what (a) discussions and (b) meetings officials in his Department have had with Xi Engineering on the Eskdalemuir Seismological Array. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) We recognise and are aware of the interference that onshore wind turbines can cause to seismological monitoring stations, and the subsequent safeguarding concerns that operators of seismological arrays can have. The Onshore Wind Taskforce Strategy, published in July 2025, prioritised bringing forward a resolution to this issue. We have and continue to work closely with the Scottish Government, the Ministry of Defence, Wind Industry representatives and Xi Engineering to deliver on this commitment |
|
BBC: Donald Trump
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Thursday 20th November 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what discussions she has had with the BBC on the level of legal fees that may be incurred in connection with the dispute with President Trump. Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) This is a matter for the BBC, whose lawyers are now dealing with the issue. The BBC is independent of the UK government and so it is a matter for them and the US President. |
|
BBC: Donald Trump
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Thursday 20th November 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what discussions she has had with the BBC on legal fees incurred in connection with President Trump. Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) This is a matter for the BBC, whose lawyers are now dealing with the issue. The BBC is independent of the UK government and so it is a matter for them and the US President. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
17 Nov 2025, 3:06 p.m. - House of Commons " John Lamont. Last week, brave grooming gang survivor Fiona " John Lamont MP (Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
18 Nov 2025, 5:35 p.m. - House of Commons "human rights compliance for victims and for families. Thank you, John Lamont. " Andy McDonald MP (Middlesbrough and Thornaby East, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
19 Nov 2025, 11:42 a.m. - House of Commons "travelling on them, and that is an authorities. >> John Lamont En bloc. " Rt Hon Hilary Benn MP, The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Leeds South, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
19 Nov 2025, 11:42 a.m. - House of Commons ">> John Lamont En bloc. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Now, the Northern Ireland Affairs Select Committee has taken evidence from " Tonia Antoniazzi MP (Gower, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
19 Nov 2025, 11:37 a.m. - House of Commons "now, while also planning for the constitutional future that is in New Ireland, as the SDLP is doing John Lamont. " Matthew Patrick MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Northern Ireland Office) (Wirral West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 21st November 2025
Minutes and decisions - R&R Programme Board minutes - 16 October 2025 Restoration and Renewal Programme Board Committee Found: Goldsmith Charlotte Simmonds (R&R Client Team) Steve Hails Jenni Singleton (R&R Client Team) John Lamont |
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Peter Stanyon, Chief Executive, Association of Electoral Administrators Elections within the House of Commons - Procedure Committee Found: Charalambous; Mr Lee Dillon; Graeme Downie; Mary Kelly Foy; Tracy Gilbert; Gurinder Singh Josan; John Lamont |
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Lord Evans of Weardale, and Rt Hon Sir Peter Riddell CBE Propriety, ethics and the wider standards landscape in the UK - Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Found: Hoare (Chair); Richard Baker; Markus Campbell- Savours; Charlotte Cane; Sam Carling; Peter Lamb; John Lamont |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 25th November 2025 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Commissioner for Public Appointments At 10:00am: Oral evidence Sir William Shawcross CVO - Commissioner for Public Appointments View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons At 2:45pm: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Baroness Scotland of Asthal KC, former Attorney General At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, Law Commission View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 9th December 2025 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the House of Lords Appointments Commission At 10:00am: Oral evidence The Baroness Deech DBE KC - Chair at House of Lords Appointments Commission View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 10th December 2025 10 a.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Leader of the House At 10:15am: Oral evidence Rt Hon Sir Alan Campbell MP - Leader of the House at House of Commons View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 13th January 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 16th December 2025 2:30 p.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Cabinet Office At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Rt Hon Darren Jones MP - Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, and Minister for Intergovernmental Relations at Cabinet Office View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 17th December 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
24 Nov 2025
Written Parliamentary Questions Procedure Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Written Parliamentary Questions (WPQs) are an important tool for Members of Parliament to obtain detailed and targeted information to aid in the scrutiny of Government policy and operations. The long-established purpose of WPQs is to uphold transparency and accountability by ensuring that the Government provides clear and timely information to Parliament, and to the public via their publication. Recent concerns have been raised that the present WPQ system has been coming under strain and not fully delivering on its intended purpose. This inquiry provides the opportunity to undertake a detailed review of WPQs, to look at their purpose, their use, and the processes that underpin them, in order to identify potential recommendations for improvement and reform. |
|
10 Dec 2025
Inquiry into the recommendations of the Infected Blood Inquiry (Stage 1) Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The report from the Infected Blood Inquiry includes recommendations for Parliament on two key areas: how to respond to calls for public inquiries and how to scrutinise the implementation of recommendations resulting from future inquiries. Our inquiry will examine those issues to inform our consideration of the broader recommendations from the Infected Blood Inquiry and to guide the approach to other future inquiries. Read the call for evidence for more detail about the inquiry. |