Information between 24th November 2025 - 4th December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 9th December 2025 4:30 p.m. John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Westminster Hall debate - Westminster Hall Subject: Impact of Network Rail timetable changes on rural communities View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 318 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 320 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 179 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 98 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 320 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 357 Noes - 174 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 364 Noes - 167 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 182 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 164 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 176 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 369 Noes - 166 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 166 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 75 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 154 Noes - 303 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 74 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 304 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
John Lamont speeches from: Office for Budget Responsibility Forecasts
John Lamont contributed 1 speech (39 words) Monday 1st December 2025 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
|
John Lamont speeches from: Budget Resolutions
John Lamont contributed 3 speeches (981 words) Thursday 27th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
John Lamont speeches from: Budget Resolutions
John Lamont contributed 2 speeches (180 words) Wednesday 26th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Planning: Stone
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Friday 28th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether the Government plans to ensure that local authorities recognise natural stone as a low-carbon material in planning guidance and local plan development. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) National design guidance, which supports the National Planning Policy Framework, states that well-designed places should be responsive to local history, culture and heritage. The guidance highlights the role of resources, including the careful selection of materials and construction techniques, to minimise any environmental impacts.
A local design code can introduce requirements on the use of materials for new development, if appropriate. |
|
Quarrying: Costs
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Tuesday 2nd December 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she plans to review (a) tax and (b) energy cost burdens facing small quarrying businesses in rural constituencies. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The government keeps all tax under review as part of the policy making process.
The government is bearing down on business energy prices more widely by reducing Great Britain’s reliance on volatile international gas prices, and through a new framework to scrutinise energy levies, ensuring they are affordable and value-for-money. |
|
Cultural Heritage: Stone
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Tuesday 2nd December 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what steps his Department is taking to support the continued availability of British natural stone for heritage restoration projects. Answered by Chris McDonald - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The Department for Business and Trade does not offer any specific support for British natural stone for heritage restoration projects. The Department for Culture, Media and Sport supports heritage restoration projects with several grant schemes, including those covering VAT for repairs through the Listed Places of Worship Grant Scheme and the Memorial Grant Scheme. Additional funds, such as the Heritage At Risk Capital Fund and the Heritage Revival Fund, provide financial support in England for repairing endangered heritage sites and repurposing neglected historic buildings for community and economic benefit. |
|
Stone: Trade Competitiveness
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Monday 1st December 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of (a) international trade practices and (b) foreign subsidies on the competitiveness of UK natural stone SMEs. Answered by Chris Bryant - Minister of State (Department for Business and Trade) The Trade Remedies Authority (TRA) is the UK’s investigatory body that exists to defend the UK against unfair international trade practices, including foreign subsidies.
I encourage UK industry to engage directly with the TRA if they believe they are being injured by unfair trading practices as it will be for the TRA to decide whether evidentiary thresholds to initiate a trade remedies investigation are met.
The Department remains vigilant to any reports of potential injury to industries from unfair trading practices and regularly engages with the natural stone sector. |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Budget Resolutions
264 speeches (48,734 words) Wednesday 26th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Mentions: 1: Robbie Moore (Con - Keighley and Ilkley) Friend the Member for Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk (John Lamont) that it was a disgrace that not - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Commissioner for Public Appointments At 10:00am: Oral evidence Sir William Shawcross CVO - Commissioner for Public Appointments View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons At 2:45pm: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Baroness Scotland of Asthal KC, former Attorney General At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, Law Commission View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 9th December 2025 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the House of Lords Appointments Commission At 10:00am: Oral evidence The Baroness Deech DBE KC - Chair at House of Lords Appointments Commission View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 10th December 2025 10 a.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Leader of the House At 10:15am: Oral evidence Rt Hon Sir Alan Campbell MP - Leader of the House at House of Commons View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 16th December 2025 2:30 p.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Cabinet Office At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Rt Hon Darren Jones MP - Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, and Minister for Intergovernmental Relations at Cabinet Office Catherine Little CB - Chief Operating Officer for the Civil Service and Permanent Secretary to the Cabinet Office at Cabinet Office View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 17th December 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 13th January 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 6th January 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Public Bodies At 10:00am: Oral evidence Joe Hill - Policy Director at Re:State View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th February 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
24 Nov 2025
Written Parliamentary Questions Procedure Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Written Parliamentary Questions (WPQs) are an important tool for Members of Parliament to obtain detailed and targeted information to aid in the scrutiny of Government policy and operations. The long-established purpose of WPQs is to uphold transparency and accountability by ensuring that the Government provides clear and timely information to Parliament, and to the public via their publication. Recent concerns have been raised that the present WPQ system has been coming under strain and not fully delivering on its intended purpose. This inquiry provides the opportunity to undertake a detailed review of WPQs, to look at their purpose, their use, and the processes that underpin them, in order to identify potential recommendations for improvement and reform. |
|
10 Dec 2025
Inquiry into the recommendations of the Infected Blood Inquiry (Stage 1) Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The report from the Infected Blood Inquiry includes recommendations for Parliament on two key areas: how to respond to calls for public inquiries and how to scrutinise the implementation of recommendations resulting from future inquiries. Our inquiry will examine those issues to inform our consideration of the broader recommendations from the Infected Blood Inquiry and to guide the approach to other future inquiries. Read the call for evidence for more detail about the inquiry. |