Information between 23rd February 2026 - 5th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
23 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 361 Noes - 84 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 156 Noes - 273 |
|
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 272 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
John Lamont speeches from: Public Right to a Vote of No Confidence
John Lamont contributed 4 speeches (1,517 words) Monday 2nd March 2026 - Westminster Hall Cabinet Office |
|
John Lamont speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
John Lamont contributed 2 speeches (83 words) Wednesday 25th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Scotland Office |
|
John Lamont speeches from: Firearms Licensing
John Lamont contributed 4 speeches (714 words) Monday 23rd February 2026 - Westminster Hall Home Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Lord Mandelson
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Tuesday 24th February 2026 Question to the Scotland Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, when Scotland Office ministers or officials last met with Peter Mandleson; and what was discussed at that meeting. Answered by Douglas Alexander - Secretary of State for Scotland I refer you to the Government's response to the Urgent Question tabled on 12 February, the Written Ministerial Statement in the name of the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister that same day, and Oral Statement on 23 February which set out an update on the Government's process. We will set out further details in due course. The Government wishes to ensure that Parliament’s instruction is met with the urgency and transparency that it deserves. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
25 Feb 2026, 11:57 a.m. - House of Commons " For 12 John Lamont speaker. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Scotland's hospitality businesses are at the heart of our high street communities are the engines of Scotland's economy. The UK " Kirsty McNeill MP, The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Scotland (Midlothian, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
25 Feb 2026, 11:58 a.m. - House of Commons " John Lamont. >> John Lamont. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Last week I met with Nick and Trish, who owned hotel in Melrose. Like many " John Lamont MP (Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 23rd March 2026 2:30 p.m. Home Office Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Home Office (including Topical Questions) Edward Leigh: What assessment she has made of the potential impact of the number of asylum seekers on levels of recorded crime. Mary Kelly Foy: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Michelle Welsh: What steps her Department is taking to help tackle child exploitation. Peter Swallow: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Robin Swann: What guidance her Department has provided to police forces on the application of public order legislation in relation to the expression of religious beliefs. Peter Fortune: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Ian Lavery: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Will Stone: What her timetable is for publishing the Independent Review of Public Order and Hate Crime Legislation. Michelle Welsh: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Seamus Logan: What discussions she has had with the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on the potential impact of changes to worker visas on businesses in rural economies. Bernard Jenkin: What assessment she has made of the potential impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on levels of illegal immigration. Richard Foord: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Gregory Stafford: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Allison Gardner: What steps her Department is taking to use technology to increase police efficiency. Robbie Moore: What steps she is taking to help tackle shop theft. Sarah Dyke: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. John Lamont: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Josh Simons: What recent steps her Department has taken to help tackle illegal working. Jim Dickson: What recent progress her Department has made on tackling antisocial behaviour. Sarah Pochin: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Wera Hobhouse: What assessment she has made of the adequacy of existing legal frameworks in relation to the non-consensual filming of women in public. Fred Thomas: What steps she is taking to help tackle financial abuse. Harpreet Uppal: What recent steps her Department has taken to help tackle knife crime. Lorraine Beavers: What steps her Department is taking to help improve neighbourhood policing. Mike Martin: If she will take steps to provide Ukrainian refugees with a route to permanent settlement. David Simmonds: How many asylum seekers were in asylum accommodation on (a) 30 September 2025 and (b) 30 June 2024. Siân Berry: What discussions she has had with Cabinet colleagues on the potential impact of the introduction of the visa brake on Chevening scholars. Catherine Fookes: What steps she is taking to help tackle violence against women and girls. Sarah Bool: How many asylum seekers were accommodated in asylum accommodation on (a) 30 December 2025 and (b) 30 June 2024. Andy McDonald: Whether the Independent Review of Public Order and Hate Crime Legislation will be published before Consideration of Lords Amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill. John Cooper: What assessment she has made of the potential impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on levels of illegal immigration. Tony Vaughan: What steps she is taking to help support refugee integration. Mary Kelly Foy: What plans her Department has to help tackle antisocial behaviour. Bayo Alaba: What recent steps her Department has taken to help tackle threats to national security in the context of the war in Iran. Kirith Entwistle: What steps her Department is taking to help tackle coercive control by ex-partners. View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 17th March 2026 11:30 a.m. Ministry of Justice Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Justice (including Topical Questions) Melanie Onn: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Pam Cox: What progress his Department has made on creating a National Listing Framework. Charlie Maynard: What steps his Department is taking through the criminal justice system to help tackle violence against women and girls. Will Forster: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Dan Carden: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Tessa Munt: What discussions he has had with his counterparts in countries to which foreign national prisoners will be returned on ensuring that prisoners serve the full term of a sentence handed down by the UK courts. Andrew Rosindell: What assessment he has made of the effectiveness of his prison early-release reforms. Alison Bennett: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Lisa Smart: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Liz Jarvis: What steps he is taking to help improve the experience of victims in court. Steve Witherden: What discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for the Home Department on protecting the right to protest. Harpreet Uppal: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Jerome Mayhew: What assessment he has made of the potential impact of his proposed changes to jury trials on the criminal justice system. Meg Hillier: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Andrew Cooper: What steps he is taking to improve transparency in court proceedings. Brian Leishman: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Tonia Antoniazzi: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Munira Wilson: What steps he is taking to support victims' rights. John Milne: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Peter Lamb: What assessment he has made of the potential merits of allowing greater use of evidence from automated enforcement technology in trials. Neil Hudson: What steps he is taking with Cabinet colleagues to support criminal prosecution of fly-tipping. Rebecca Smith: What assessment he has made of the potential impact of his proposed changes to jury trials on the criminal justice system. Neil Shastri-Hurst: what assessment he has made of the potential impact of his proposed changes to jury trials on the criminal justice system. Jas Athwal: What plans he has to help improve victim confidence in the justice system. Lincoln Jopp: what assessment he has made of the potential impact of his proposed changes to jury trials on the criminal justice system. Adam Thompson: What steps he is taking to help support children involved in knife crime through the criminal justice system. Anna Dixon: What plans his Department has to provide adequate funding for the Crown Court. Ashley Fox: What assessment he has made of the potential impact of his proposed changes to jury trials on the criminal justice system. Gill Furniss: What steps he is taking to help improve standards in the bailiff industry. Jim Dickson: What steps he is taking to tackle backlogs in the courts. Oliver Ryan: what steps he is taking to tackle backlogs in the courts. Lloyd Hatton: what steps he is taking to tackle backlogs in the courts. Louie French: what assessment he has made of the potential impact of his proposed changes to jury trials on the criminal justice system. John Lamont: What steps his Department is taking ensure that people convicted of charges related to grooming gangs receive adequate sentences. Calum Miller: What steps he is taking to reform the family court. View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Public Right to a Vote of No Confidence
19 speeches (4,981 words) Monday 2nd March 2026 - Westminster Hall Cabinet Office Mentions: 1: Sarah Gibson (LD - Chippenham) Member for Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk (John Lamont) mentioned. - Link to Speech 2: Mike Wood (Con - Kingswinford and South Staffordshire) Friend the Member for Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk (John Lamont) in acknowledging the many organisations - Link to Speech 3: Anna Turley (LAB - Redcar) Member for Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk (John Lamont) for introducing the debate, and thank the - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 3rd March 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Cabinet Office At 10:00am: Oral evidence Catherine Little CB - Chief Operating Officer for the Civil Service and Permanent Secretary to the Cabinet Office at Cabinet Office Caroline Patterson - Chief Financial Officer at Cabinet Office David Foley - Chief Executive at Infected Blood Compensation Authority Angela MacDonald - Second Permanent Secretary at HM Revenue and Customs Ellen Atkinson - Acting Director General of Propriety and Ethics at Cabinet Office View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th March 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 4th March 2026 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th March 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Public Bodies At 10:00am: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Lord Maude of Horsham - Former Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office (2010-2015) View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 11th March 2026 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 5th May 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 17th March 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Inquiry into the recommendations of the Infected Blood Inquiry (Stage 1) At 10:00am: Oral evidence Professor Andrew Williams - Head of Department, University of Warwick Rosanna Ellul - Policy and Parliamentary Manager, INQUEST View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th March 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work and performance of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman At 10:00am: Oral evidence Paula Sussex CBE - Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Rebecca Hilsenrath KC (Hon) - Chief Executive Officer at Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 25th March 2026 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
16 Mar 2026
Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee Debates Modernisation Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The cross-party Modernisation Committee is holding an inquiry into Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee debates, as part of its ongoing work on how time is used in the Commons. Backbench Business Committee debates offer MPs a vital route to raise issues on behalf of their constituents, and since its establishment the Committee has ensured that backbench voices are heard regularly. The Petitions Committee has facilitated many debates on e-petitions started by members of the public, ensuring that issues with significant public support are brought before the House. Many of these debates have helped raise the profile of important issues and, in some cases, led to tangible action being taken. The Modernisation Committee’s inquiry will look at whether the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates is appropriate and effective. It will also explore other issues such as whether some e-petitions debates should take place in the Chamber on a more regular basis. MPs on the Committee will also explore the issues highlighted in the Backbench Business Committee’s 15 anniversary report, and how the House can continue to support and strengthen the Committee’s work. Terms of Reference The Backbench Business Committee has 35 days allotted in each session for proceedings in the Chamber/Westminster Hall on backbench business, of which at least 27 should be in the Chamber. More information can be found on their website. The Petitions Committee can schedule a petition or petitions for debate in Westminster Hall on a Monday from 4.30pm, for up to three hours. More information is available here. We will be exploring the following questions as part of our inquiry: 1. Is the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates appropriate and effective?
3. Is the current allocation of Backbench Business debates between the Chamber (27 days) and Westminster Hall (8 days) correct? 4. Are there any improvements that could be made to the Backbench Business Committee’s process to agree applications for backbench business debates (including ensuring debates are popular amongst members and on topical subjects)? 5. Are the existing mechanisms available for the Petitions Committee to hold debates in the Chamber (to apply via Backbench Business Committee, or to be allocated time by the Government) sufficient or should the Petitions Committee have guaranteed time in the Chamber? |