Information between 9th March 2026 - 19th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 104 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 311 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 104 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 203 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 177 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 181 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 173 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 106 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 182 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 109 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 171 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 292 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 161 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 283 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 292 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Student Loans - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 266 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Fuel Duty - View Vote Context John Lamont voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 259 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Employment Rights: Investigatory Powers - View Vote Context John Lamont voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 368 Noes - 107 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
John Lamont speeches from: Fuel Duty
John Lamont contributed 3 speeches (195 words) Wednesday 18th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
John Lamont speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
John Lamont contributed 1 speech (62 words) Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
|
John Lamont speeches from: Rural Roads
John Lamont contributed 1 speech (96 words) Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Westminster Hall HM Treasury |
|
John Lamont speeches from: Member Defections: Automatic By-elections
John Lamont contributed 7 speeches (435 words) Monday 16th March 2026 - Westminster Hall Cabinet Office |
|
John Lamont speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
John Lamont contributed 2 speeches (57 words) Thursday 12th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
|
John Lamont speeches from: Finance (No. 2) Bill
John Lamont contributed 1 speech (83 words) Report stage Wednesday 11th March 2026 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
|
John Lamont speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
John Lamont contributed 1 speech (66 words) Tuesday 10th March 2026 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
|
John Lamont speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
John Lamont contributed 2 speeches (67 words) Monday 9th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of replacing the proposed cap on the number of branded items with a monetary cap set by regulations. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Assessments made in relation to the limit on branded school uniform and physical education kit contained in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill (CWSB) have been published at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-wellbeing-and-schools-bill-impact-assessments. The department has also assessed the impact of a cost cap versus a numeric limit on branded uniform items and found a cost cap would be complex, difficult to enforce and burdensome for schools. In contrast a numeric limit is clear, simpler, and will deliver savings for parents more quickly. It remains the best approach for driving down the costs of uniform. The department published statutory guidance on the cost of school uniforms last autumn to allow schools to prepare for September 2026 and have committed to updating it following Royal Assent for the CWSB. The guidance is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cost-of-school-uniforms. This measure does not remove the ability for schools to set their own uniform requirements. We strongly encourage schools to have a uniform, as it can play a key role in promoting the ethos of a school, providing a sense of belonging and identity and setting an appropriate tone for education. |
|
Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the proposed cap on branded school uniform items on specialist academies, including those with a particular sporting or technical focus. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Assessments made in relation to the limit on branded school uniform and physical education kit contained in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill (CWSB) have been published at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-wellbeing-and-schools-bill-impact-assessments. The department has also assessed the impact of a cost cap versus a numeric limit on branded uniform items and found a cost cap would be complex, difficult to enforce and burdensome for schools. In contrast a numeric limit is clear, simpler, and will deliver savings for parents more quickly. It remains the best approach for driving down the costs of uniform. The department published statutory guidance on the cost of school uniforms last autumn to allow schools to prepare for September 2026 and have committed to updating it following Royal Assent for the CWSB. The guidance is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cost-of-school-uniforms. This measure does not remove the ability for schools to set their own uniform requirements. We strongly encourage schools to have a uniform, as it can play a key role in promoting the ethos of a school, providing a sense of belonging and identity and setting an appropriate tone for education. |
|
Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the proposed cap on branded school uniform items on pupil behaviour and attendance in schools. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Assessments made in relation to the limit on branded school uniform and physical education kit contained in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill (CWSB) have been published at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-wellbeing-and-schools-bill-impact-assessments. The department has also assessed the impact of a cost cap versus a numeric limit on branded uniform items and found a cost cap would be complex, difficult to enforce and burdensome for schools. In contrast a numeric limit is clear, simpler, and will deliver savings for parents more quickly. It remains the best approach for driving down the costs of uniform. The department published statutory guidance on the cost of school uniforms last autumn to allow schools to prepare for September 2026 and have committed to updating it following Royal Assent for the CWSB. The guidance is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cost-of-school-uniforms. This measure does not remove the ability for schools to set their own uniform requirements. We strongly encourage schools to have a uniform, as it can play a key role in promoting the ethos of a school, providing a sense of belonging and identity and setting an appropriate tone for education. |
|
Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of changes to school uniform policy on academic outcomes. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Assessments made in relation to the limit on branded school uniform and physical education kit contained in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill (CWSB) have been published at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-wellbeing-and-schools-bill-impact-assessments. The department has also assessed the impact of a cost cap versus a numeric limit on branded uniform items and found a cost cap would be complex, difficult to enforce and burdensome for schools. In contrast a numeric limit is clear, simpler, and will deliver savings for parents more quickly. It remains the best approach for driving down the costs of uniform. The department published statutory guidance on the cost of school uniforms last autumn to allow schools to prepare for September 2026 and have committed to updating it following Royal Assent for the CWSB. The guidance is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cost-of-school-uniforms. This measure does not remove the ability for schools to set their own uniform requirements. We strongly encourage schools to have a uniform, as it can play a key role in promoting the ethos of a school, providing a sense of belonging and identity and setting an appropriate tone for education. |
|
Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she plans to review or clarify aspects of the school uniform guidance prior to the provisions of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill coming into force. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Assessments made in relation to the limit on branded school uniform and physical education kit contained in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill (CWSB) have been published at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-wellbeing-and-schools-bill-impact-assessments. The department has also assessed the impact of a cost cap versus a numeric limit on branded uniform items and found a cost cap would be complex, difficult to enforce and burdensome for schools. In contrast a numeric limit is clear, simpler, and will deliver savings for parents more quickly. It remains the best approach for driving down the costs of uniform. The department published statutory guidance on the cost of school uniforms last autumn to allow schools to prepare for September 2026 and have committed to updating it following Royal Assent for the CWSB. The guidance is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cost-of-school-uniforms. This measure does not remove the ability for schools to set their own uniform requirements. We strongly encourage schools to have a uniform, as it can play a key role in promoting the ethos of a school, providing a sense of belonging and identity and setting an appropriate tone for education. |
|
Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the proposed cap on branded uniform items on curricular and extracurricular PE participation. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Assessments made in relation to the limit on branded school uniform and physical education kit contained in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill (CWSB) have been published at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-wellbeing-and-schools-bill-impact-assessments. The department has also assessed the impact of a cost cap versus a numeric limit on branded uniform items and found a cost cap would be complex, difficult to enforce and burdensome for schools. In contrast a numeric limit is clear, simpler, and will deliver savings for parents more quickly. It remains the best approach for driving down the costs of uniform. The department published statutory guidance on the cost of school uniforms last autumn to allow schools to prepare for September 2026 and have committed to updating it following Royal Assent for the CWSB. The guidance is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cost-of-school-uniforms. This measure does not remove the ability for schools to set their own uniform requirements. We strongly encourage schools to have a uniform, as it can play a key role in promoting the ethos of a school, providing a sense of belonging and identity and setting an appropriate tone for education. |
|
Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what feedback her Department has received from schools on the practical application of the three-item cap on branded uniform. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Assessments made in relation to the limit on branded school uniform and physical education kit contained in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill (CWSB) have been published at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-wellbeing-and-schools-bill-impact-assessments. The department has also assessed the impact of a cost cap versus a numeric limit on branded uniform items and found a cost cap would be complex, difficult to enforce and burdensome for schools. In contrast a numeric limit is clear, simpler, and will deliver savings for parents more quickly. It remains the best approach for driving down the costs of uniform. The department published statutory guidance on the cost of school uniforms last autumn to allow schools to prepare for September 2026 and have committed to updating it following Royal Assent for the CWSB. The guidance is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cost-of-school-uniforms. This measure does not remove the ability for schools to set their own uniform requirements. We strongly encourage schools to have a uniform, as it can play a key role in promoting the ethos of a school, providing a sense of belonging and identity and setting an appropriate tone for education. |
|
Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the proposed uniform cap on the overall cost of school uniform for parents. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Assessments made in relation to the limit on branded school uniform and physical education kit contained in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill (CWSB) have been published at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-wellbeing-and-schools-bill-impact-assessments. The department has also assessed the impact of a cost cap versus a numeric limit on branded uniform items and found a cost cap would be complex, difficult to enforce and burdensome for schools. In contrast a numeric limit is clear, simpler, and will deliver savings for parents more quickly. It remains the best approach for driving down the costs of uniform. The department published statutory guidance on the cost of school uniforms last autumn to allow schools to prepare for September 2026 and have committed to updating it following Royal Assent for the CWSB. The guidance is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cost-of-school-uniforms. This measure does not remove the ability for schools to set their own uniform requirements. We strongly encourage schools to have a uniform, as it can play a key role in promoting the ethos of a school, providing a sense of belonging and identity and setting an appropriate tone for education. |
|
Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the implementation timetable for school uniform guidance on school procurement cycles and existing supplier arrangements. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Assessments made in relation to the limit on branded school uniform and physical education kit contained in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill (CWSB) have been published at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-wellbeing-and-schools-bill-impact-assessments. The department has also assessed the impact of a cost cap versus a numeric limit on branded uniform items and found a cost cap would be complex, difficult to enforce and burdensome for schools. In contrast a numeric limit is clear, simpler, and will deliver savings for parents more quickly. It remains the best approach for driving down the costs of uniform. The department published statutory guidance on the cost of school uniforms last autumn to allow schools to prepare for September 2026 and have committed to updating it following Royal Assent for the CWSB. The guidance is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cost-of-school-uniforms. This measure does not remove the ability for schools to set their own uniform requirements. We strongly encourage schools to have a uniform, as it can play a key role in promoting the ethos of a school, providing a sense of belonging and identity and setting an appropriate tone for education. |
|
Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of time available to schools to implement the recent changes to school uniform guidance ahead of the proposed legislative cap. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Assessments made in relation to the limit on branded school uniform and physical education kit contained in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill (CWSB) have been published at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-wellbeing-and-schools-bill-impact-assessments. The department has also assessed the impact of a cost cap versus a numeric limit on branded uniform items and found a cost cap would be complex, difficult to enforce and burdensome for schools. In contrast a numeric limit is clear, simpler, and will deliver savings for parents more quickly. It remains the best approach for driving down the costs of uniform. The department published statutory guidance on the cost of school uniforms last autumn to allow schools to prepare for September 2026 and have committed to updating it following Royal Assent for the CWSB. The guidance is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cost-of-school-uniforms. This measure does not remove the ability for schools to set their own uniform requirements. We strongly encourage schools to have a uniform, as it can play a key role in promoting the ethos of a school, providing a sense of belonging and identity and setting an appropriate tone for education. |
|
Schools: Uniforms
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment has her Department made of the potential merits of allowing a longer implementation period for changes to school uniform policy. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Assessments made in relation to the limit on branded school uniform and physical education kit contained in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill (CWSB) have been published at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-wellbeing-and-schools-bill-impact-assessments. The department has also assessed the impact of a cost cap versus a numeric limit on branded uniform items and found a cost cap would be complex, difficult to enforce and burdensome for schools. In contrast a numeric limit is clear, simpler, and will deliver savings for parents more quickly. It remains the best approach for driving down the costs of uniform. The department published statutory guidance on the cost of school uniforms last autumn to allow schools to prepare for September 2026 and have committed to updating it following Royal Assent for the CWSB. The guidance is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cost-of-school-uniforms. This measure does not remove the ability for schools to set their own uniform requirements. We strongly encourage schools to have a uniform, as it can play a key role in promoting the ethos of a school, providing a sense of belonging and identity and setting an appropriate tone for education. |
|
Taxation
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Tuesday 10th March 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate she has made of taxation levels in each of the next five years. Answered by James Murray - Chief Secretary to the Treasury The Office for Budget Responsibility produce forecasts of future tax receipts as part of its Economic and Fiscal Outlook. The latest Economic and Fiscal outlook was published at the Spring Forecast and it included forecast tax receipts for the next five years.
|
|
Offences against Children: Sentencing
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Tuesday 17th March 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps his Department is taking ensure that people convicted of charges related to grooming gangs receive adequate sentences. Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip The Government is determined to ensure that grooming gang members face the toughest possible sentences for their crimes.
This is why we are introducing a new statutory aggravating factor requiring courts to consider grooming when sentencing for specified sexual offences committed against those under 18. |
|
Nuclear Power: Scotland
Asked by: John Lamont (Conservative - Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) Wednesday 18th March 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what discussions his Department has had with the (a) Scotland Office and (b) Scottish Government on the promotion of new nuclear development in Scotland. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) Whilst the Scottish Government opposes the building of new nuclear power stations in Scotland, the UK Government is kickstarting the biggest nuclear building programme in a generation in the rest of the UK, creating thousands of good jobs and driving investment into communities.
In response to growing cross-party interest in new nuclear power in Scotland, UK Ministers have asked Great British Energy - Nuclear to assess Scotland’s potential for new nuclear development.
UK Ministers recently engaged with Scottish Government Ministers and remain open to discussions on opportunities for new nuclear in Scotland. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
9 Mar 2026, 2:47 p.m. - House of Commons "foreign nationals has fallen since January 2025, from 17% to 15.5% in January 2025, from 17% to 15.5% in the latest statistics. January 2026, John Lamont. " Q4. What assessment he has made of trends in the number of foreign nationals claiming Universal Credit. (908145) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
9 Mar 2026, 2:46 p.m. - House of Commons " John Lamont. number four. Please, Minister. >> Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. Universal Credit is primarily reserved for people settled in the " Q4. What assessment he has made of trends in the number of foreign nationals claiming Universal Credit. (908145) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2026, 3:23 p.m. - House of Commons "John Lamont. David Mundell. Harriet Cross Andrew Bowie. So. David Davis. Jamie Stone. Christine Jardine, sir. " John Cooper MP (Dumfries and Galloway, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2026, 3:23 p.m. - House of Commons "the bell? >> Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. John Lamont. David Mundell. Harriet " John Cooper MP (Dumfries and Galloway, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Fuel Duty
214 speeches (30,422 words) Wednesday 18th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions Mentions: 1: Robbie Moore (Con - Keighley and Ilkley) Friend the Member for Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk (John Lamont). - Link to Speech |
|
Rural Roads
89 speeches (9,500 words) Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Westminster Hall HM Treasury Mentions: 1: Jamie Stone (LD - Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) Member for Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk (John Lamont), said, the Scottish Government have a whole - Link to Speech |
|
Member Defections: Automatic By-elections
49 speeches (10,154 words) Monday 16th March 2026 - Westminster Hall Cabinet Office Mentions: 1: Anna Turley (LAB - Redcar) Member for Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk (John Lamont)—that our current constitutional arrangements - Link to Speech |
|
Lord Advocate
2 speeches (967 words) 1st reading1st Reading Wednesday 11th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Mentions: 1: John Cooper (Con - Dumfries and Galloway) Scotland, I commend this Bill to the House.Question put and agreed to.Ordered,That John Cooper, John Lamont - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 19th March 2026
Special Report - 1st Special Report – Access to the House of Commons and its procedures: House Administration Response Modernisation Committee Found: Erdington) Rachel Hopkins (Labour; Luton South and South Bedfordshire) Leigh Ingham (Labour; Stafford) John Lamont |
|
Thursday 19th March 2026
Special Report - Large Print – 1st Special Report – Access to the House of Commons and its procedures: House Administration Response Modernisation Committee Found: Erdington) Rachel Hopkins (Labour; Luton South and South Bedfordshire)Leigh Ingham (Labour; Stafford) John Lamont |
|
Tuesday 17th March 2026
Oral Evidence - Professor Andrew Williams, and Rosanna Ellul Inquiry into the recommendations of the Infected Blood Inquiry (Stage 1) - Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Found: Members present: Simon Hoare (Chair); Richard Baker; Charlotte Cane; Sam Carling; Peter Lamb; John Lamont |
|
Tuesday 10th March 2026
Oral Evidence - Lord Maude of Horsham Public Bodies - Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Found: present: Simon Hoare (Chair); Markus Campbell-Savours; Sam Carling; Lauren Edwards; Peter Lamb; John Lamont |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 17th March 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Inquiry into the recommendations of the Infected Blood Inquiry (Stage 1) At 10:00am: Oral evidence Professor Andrew Williams - Head of Department, University of Warwick Rosanna Ellul - Policy and Parliamentary Manager, INQUEST View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th March 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work and performance of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman At 10:00am: Oral evidence Paula Sussex CBE - Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Rebecca Hilsenrath KC (Hon) - Chief Executive Officer at Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 25th March 2026 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 14th April 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Propriety, ethics and the wider standards landscape in the UK At 10:00am: Oral evidence Doug Chalmers CB DSO OBE - Chair, Ethics and Integrity Committee View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 19th May 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 30th June 2026 1 p.m. Restoration and Renewal Programme Board - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
16 Mar 2026
Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee Debates Modernisation Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The cross-party Modernisation Committee is holding an inquiry into Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee debates, as part of its ongoing work on how time is used in the Commons. Backbench Business Committee debates offer MPs a vital route to raise issues on behalf of their constituents, and since its establishment the Committee has ensured that backbench voices are heard regularly. The Petitions Committee has facilitated many debates on e-petitions started by members of the public, ensuring that issues with significant public support are brought before the House. Many of these debates have helped raise the profile of important issues and, in some cases, led to tangible action being taken. The Modernisation Committee’s inquiry will look at whether the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates is appropriate and effective. It will also explore other issues such as whether some e-petitions debates should take place in the Chamber on a more regular basis. MPs on the Committee will also explore the issues highlighted in the Backbench Business Committee’s 15 anniversary report, and how the House can continue to support and strengthen the Committee’s work. Terms of Reference The Backbench Business Committee has 35 days allotted in each session for proceedings in the Chamber/Westminster Hall on backbench business, of which at least 27 should be in the Chamber. More information can be found on their website. The Petitions Committee can schedule a petition or petitions for debate in Westminster Hall on a Monday from 4.30pm, for up to three hours. More information is available here. We will be exploring the following questions as part of our inquiry: 1. Is the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates appropriate and effective?
3. Is the current allocation of Backbench Business debates between the Chamber (27 days) and Westminster Hall (8 days) correct? 4. Are there any improvements that could be made to the Backbench Business Committee’s process to agree applications for backbench business debates (including ensuring debates are popular amongst members and on topical subjects)? 5. Are the existing mechanisms available for the Petitions Committee to hold debates in the Chamber (to apply via Backbench Business Committee, or to be allocated time by the Government) sufficient or should the Petitions Committee have guaranteed time in the Chamber? |