All 3 Debates between John Hemming and Vince Cable

Postal Services Bill

Debate between John Hemming and Vince Cable
Wednesday 27th October 2010

(13 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Vince Cable Portrait Vince Cable
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will take one more intervention.

John Hemming Portrait John Hemming (Birmingham, Yardley) (LD)
- Hansard - -

On the issue of the individual, private, sub-contracted post offices, does my right hon. Friend find it surprising that Labour Members cannot understand that those post offices will remain open as independent sub-contractors with a mutual network?

Vince Cable Portrait Vince Cable
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes. Labour Members seem to find the concept of an expanding, properly invested post office system a bit of a culture shock. They have got used to a decade of decline—they presided over it.

Higher Education and Student Finance

Debate between John Hemming and Vince Cable
Tuesday 12th October 2010

(13 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Vince Cable Portrait Vince Cable
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Of course we realised that the financial position of the country was serious. We must now make very difficult choices on the back of that, which I am sure is understood as well in Northern Ireland as it is everywhere else in the UK. I am sure that the hon. Gentleman’s party, which shares in government in Northern Ireland, accepts that extremely difficult decisions on higher education need to be made there as elsewhere.

John Hemming Portrait John Hemming (Birmingham, Yardley) (LD)
- Hansard - -

Like the Secretary of State, I signed the pledge, which, as I remember, calls for a fairer system. I therefore congratulate him on lobbying Lord Browne into producing a report that will lead to a fairer system—the system will be more progressive and part-time tuition fees will be scrapped. However, that does not mean that the system is fair enough. Will the Secretary of State put me in touch with his private office, so that we can look at the nuances of some of the modelling of the net present values?

Vince Cable Portrait Vince Cable
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend asks me to share the modelling with hon. Members. I am improvising, but I do not see any problem with that. There is probably an intellectual property issue, but in the public interest, we should of course share the analysis.

Industry (Government Support)

Debate between John Hemming and Vince Cable
Wednesday 16th June 2010

(13 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Vince Cable Portrait Vince Cable
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The right hon. Gentleman misunderstands completely. [Hon. Members: “Oh.”] He is confusing two different things: one is function, and the other is geography. They are different things. The RDAs will not continue, under any definition of our policy as it emerges through consultation—they will not perform the same range of functions as they do currently. If local people wish it, they might have a regional form, and that will emerge in due course. I think that enough has been said about the matter. I know that the right hon. Gentleman has struggled to take it in, but I think that where we are heading is abundantly clear.

John Hemming Portrait John Hemming (Birmingham, Yardley) (LD)
- Hansard - -

To explain the point to the Opposition, geography varies around the country. The west midlands has a number of city regions, and it would be positive development if each had a local enterprise partnership. We do not know whether Coventry is in or out of greater Birmingham, but we want a city regional basis. The north-east, however, might like a regional approach. My right hon. Friend will agree that the Opposition do not understand the concept of geography and boundaries, and believe in enforcing the same rules across the country, rather than leaving such matters to local people.

Vince Cable Portrait Vince Cable
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is absolutely right. The basic problem—and the reason that it is taking some time to explain the matter to the Opposition—is that the Opposition believe that the status quo must be protected because they invented it. There will, however, be fundamental changes.