All 3 Debates between John Hemming and Lord Pickles

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

Debate between John Hemming and Lord Pickles
Wednesday 4th February 2015

(9 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I shall look very carefully at that, and at the way in which victims and survivors are compensated—perhaps outside this particular. I suspect it is possible that the council itself may well be facing some significant law cases, which it will have to defend. But of course I shall look very carefully on this, and I will also look to the hon. Gentleman to offer some advice on the choice of commissioners as well as on the matters he asks about.

John Hemming Portrait John Hemming (Birmingham, Yardley) (LD)
- Hansard - -

Rotherham, like all local authorities responsible for children, submits a return to the Government on what is happening to the children—the SSDA903 return. Every year, Rotherham is audited on what happens with its finances, so that the finances are not fabricated. In the SSDA903 returns, certain children leave care for “other” reasons; they may be trafficked, they may be abused—we do not know. Would it not be a good idea for the Government to have an independent audit of what happens to these children, and what is happening to the children who leave care officially for “other” reasons?

Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman will know from many conversations I have had with him since I have held this post and before that I have a lot of sympathy with what he says, and that is one of the reasons why I am very proud to support the foyer movement. I certainly feel that as a nation we need to do a lot more in terms of offering assistance to people who leave the care system, but I go back to the point the hon. Gentleman just made: the returns looked great, but the reality on the ground did not.

Growth and Infrastructure Bill

Debate between John Hemming and Lord Pickles
Tuesday 16th April 2013

(11 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Absolutely, and that is why we are looking towards Lord Taylor’s advice in respect of tweaking the article 4 process. It has undergone a number of changes. It changed under the last Government in 2008, and we made a change in 2010, so article 4 is not set in concrete—it is not buried under a back patio.

John Hemming Portrait John Hemming (Birmingham, Yardley) (LD)
- Hansard - -

Does my right hon. Friend accept that one reason why no compensation has been paid under article 4 is that local authorities are frightened to issue article 4 directives under which they may have to pay compensation?

Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have enjoyed campaigning with the hon. Gentleman on other issues, but I have to say he is being highly speculative here, as there is no real evidence of such a self-denying ordinance by local authorities.

Local Government Finance

Debate between John Hemming and Lord Pickles
Wednesday 19th December 2012

(11 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Pickles Portrait Mr Pickles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Of course, West Dorset receives considerably less money than Hull. The hon. Lady’s council will receive per household a figure well above the national average at £2,371, and a drop in spending power of less than the national average at 1.4%. She should show some leadership.

John Hemming Portrait John Hemming (Birmingham, Yardley) (LD)
- Hansard - -

When Labour took control of Birmingham earlier this year, the council immediately put up costs by what will be £10 million a year by increasing wages for some staff by as much as 70%. It is now aiming to charge the poor council tax at 24%. Does the Secretary of State agree that we should protect the poor and not put up costs in a time of financial problems?