Attorney General’s Office: Conflicts of Interest Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Attorney General

Attorney General’s Office: Conflicts of Interest

Joe Robertson Excerpts
Thursday 23rd January 2025

(1 day, 14 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lucy Rigby Portrait The Solicitor General
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have been abundantly clear on this: where the Attorney General has conflicts, he will recuse himself. The Law Officers’ convention does not permit me to say in relation to which matters he has recused himself, because in doing so I would reveal the matters that the Law Officers have been asked to advise on, or indeed have advised on.

Joe Robertson Portrait Joe Robertson (Isle of Wight East) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Like the Solicitor General I also practise as a solicitor. She must know that the questions that are being put are not calling into question a barrister’s right to represent clients. This is about a barrister who is now the Attorney General. Does she accept that the Law Officers’ convention is being extended in the interests of the Attorney General not answering legitimate questions about recusal and conflict of interest, and that nobody should seek to extend that principle beyond its intention in order to remain silent?

Lucy Rigby Portrait The Solicitor General
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not accept that the Law Officers’ convention is being extended at all. As I have said, I could not be more clear: where the Attorney General has conflicts, he will recuse himself.