Debates between Jo Churchill and Nickie Aiken during the 2019-2024 Parliament

Thu 10th Feb 2022

Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [ Lords ]

Debate between Jo Churchill and Nickie Aiken
Nickie Aiken Portrait Nickie Aiken (Cities of London and Westminster) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I welcome the Bill and am very proud to be sitting on this Public Bill Committee. The Bill is proportionate, timely and targeted. It is important, because the public believe passionately in animal welfare. Does my hon. Friend the Minister agree that their justified outpouring of revulsion at the recent video of the West Ham footballer Kurt Zouma suggests that the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals should consider inviting him to animal welfare training in order to prove animal sentience?

Jo Churchill Portrait Jo Churchill
- Hansard - -

I thank my hon. Friend for her intervention, and I join her in being appalled at what we have seen. I agree that the public care greatly about animal welfare, but the Bill is science led and we are looking at the evidence base. It is for other bodies to choose the direction in which they might take restorative action so that people can learn and be called to account for their behaviour.

The Animal Welfare Committee is a well-respected source of advice on animal welfare issues, but it is not designed to assess policy. Allowing committees to specialise in their separate functions, and ensuring that those who sit on them have the expertise, is the best way to ensure that the objectives are delivered well. I urge that clause 1 stand part of the Bill.

--- Later in debate ---
Nickie Aiken Portrait Nickie Aiken
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

May I share your sentiments, Sir Charles, and say thank you to our parliamentary staff here and across the estate?

Jo Churchill Portrait Jo Churchill
- Hansard - -

I add my voice to that, but I would also like to thank my Bill team and members of my private office, who are nothing but always by my side, for which I thank them.