Disability Equality Training (Taxi and Private Hire Vehicle Drivers) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Transport

Disability Equality Training (Taxi and Private Hire Vehicle Drivers) Bill

Jim Cunningham Excerpts
2nd reading: House of Commons
Friday 18th November 2016

(8 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Disability Equality Training (Taxi and Private Hire Vehicle Drivers) Bill 2016-17 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Andrew Gwynne Portrait Andrew Gwynne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Absolutely. I discovered as a result of the discussions I had when preparing my Bill that not all the relevant functions have yet been devolved to Ministers in the Welsh Government and that some of the duties therefore still rest with the Secretary of State for Transport here in Whitehall. That is why some of the provisions in the Bill relate to Wales. But my hon. Friend is absolutely right: we need to get these provisions in place across the whole United Kingdom. There are parts of the UK that have advanced further down this track than England and Wales have done, and my Bill is trying to put that right.

Jim Cunningham Portrait Mr Jim Cunningham (Coventry South) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

What response has my hon. Friend had from taxi drivers’ associations?

Andrew Gwynne Portrait Andrew Gwynne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is absolutely right to mention them.

Returning to the measures in the Bill, the Local Government Association is fully on board with my proposals, but we must ensure that local councils have the necessary tools at their disposal, so that they can properly administer the training scheme and ensure that the measures are being adhered to. Out of 297 visually impaired respondents to a Guide Dogs survey, 68% reported that they had not informed the authorities when an individual had refused them service. The most common reason they gave was that they did not believe anything would come of it. A freedom of information request and parliamentary questions that I have asked have made it clear that, since the practice of refusal became illegal in 2010, there were no convictions in 2011, there was one in 2012, one in 2013 and one in 2014. Yet we know that 42% of assistance dog users in any one year are refused a taxi service. There is a big problem here, and ignorance of the law is no justification. That is why training is absolutely crucial.

Let me be clear: those taxi and minicab drivers who are refusing to serve visually impaired and wheelchair passengers are breaking the law. The only exception for refusing someone with an assistance dog is on medical grounds, and for that they have to have a certified medical certificate permanently on display in the taxi. They cannot just turn up at a kerbside and decide that they will not take a dog because of some spurious allergy that they have just decided they have.