Information between 4th January 2026 - 24th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
7 Jan 2026 - Rural Communities - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 332 |
|
7 Jan 2026 - Jury Trials - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 290 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Public Order - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 26 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 110 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 332 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 182 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 127 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 185 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 184 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles: Legacy and Reconciliation - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 373 Noes - 106 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 194 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 195 Noes - 317 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 326 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Jessica Toale speeches from: Business Rates: Retail, Hospitality and Leisure
Jessica Toale contributed 1 speech (63 words) Monday 19th January 2026 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
|
Jessica Toale speeches from: Social Media: Non-consensual Sexual Deepfakes
Jessica Toale contributed 1 speech (73 words) Monday 12th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Science, Innovation & Technology |
|
Jessica Toale speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Jessica Toale contributed 2 speeches (109 words) Thursday 8th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Meningitis: Vaccination
Asked by: Jessica Toale (Labour - Bournemouth West) Monday 5th January 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, when the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation last reviewed the cost-effectiveness model for providing the Meningitis B vaccine to teenagers; and whether his Department plans to commission an updated model. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) In 2013, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advised that the cost-effectiveness of an adolescent Meningitis B (MenB) vaccination programme would be dependent on the impact of the vaccine on protection against meningococcal carriage, which was uncertain at the time. Since this advice was published, the JCVI has continued to review the MenB vaccination programme. Recent evidence, discussed by the JCVI meningococcal sub-committee in March 2025, indicated that MenB vaccination in adolescents has little to no effect on meningococcal carriage. The sub-committee noted that when available, they would like to review a model evaluating the impact of MenB vaccine when given in a teenage programme in a two-dose schedule, including impact on meningococcal disease and gonorrhoea. |
|
Meningitis: Vaccination
Asked by: Jessica Toale (Labour - Bournemouth West) Monday 5th January 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of extending routine NHS vaccination against Meningitis B to teenagers and first-year university students. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Policy regarding vaccination programmes is based on advice from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI). The JCVI keeps all vaccination programmes under review, and the meningococcal sub-committee have met a number of times over the past year to discuss the meningococcal vaccination programme. The minutes of all JCVI meetings are available at the following link: In 2013, the JCVI advised that the cost-effectiveness of an adolescent Meningitis B (MenB) vaccination programme would be dependent on the impact of the vaccine on protection against meningococcal carriage, which was uncertain at the time. Recent evidence considered by the meningococcal sub-committee indicates that MenB vaccines do not protect against carriage of meningococcus serogroup B in adolescents. The sub-committee noted that when available, they would like to review a model evaluating the impact of the MenB vaccine when given in a teenage programme in a two-dose schedule, including the impact on meningococcal disease and gonorrhoea. Adolescents remain eligible for the MenACWY vaccine until their 25th birthday. |
|
Meningitis: Vaccination
Asked by: Jessica Toale (Labour - Bournemouth West) Monday 5th January 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent assessment his Department has made of trends in the level of Meningitis B cases among teenagers and university students; and what steps he is taking to help reduce that level. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The UK Health Security Agency continually monitors the incidence and profile of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in England across all age groups to provide information to the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation to help inform policy decisions. The United Kingdom has a world-leading meningococcal vaccine programme, and we were the first country to introduce a national Meningitis C (MenC) vaccine programme in 1999 and an infant programme targeting Meningitis B (MenB) disease in 2015, the year in which the teenage MenACWY vaccination was also introduced. Cases of IMD in England have fallen from over 2,500 in 1998/99, before the first routine meningococcal vaccination against MenC, was introduced, to 378 cases in 2024/225. The MenACWY vaccine also stops carriage and transmission. With this high population-level control of MenACWY disease, MenB disease accounted for 313 of the 378, or 83% of, cases in 2024/25. MenB remains rare but is now the leading cause of meningococcal disease in all age groups in England, including teenagers and young adults. Further information for the 2024 to 2025 epidemiological year, running from July 2024 to June 2025, is available at the following link: |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
8 Jan 2026, 9:44 a.m. - House of Commons " Jessica Toale. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker. >> Improving local bus routes, particularly those that connect the town centre, the station and the airport, frequently come up in my " Jessica Toale MP (Bournemouth West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Jan 2026, 5:40 p.m. - House of Commons " Jessica Toale. >> Thank you, Madam Speaker. >> Can I welcome the Secretary. >> Of State serious and rapid action to tackle non-consensual " Jessica Toale MP (Bournemouth West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
19 Jan 2026, 4:39 p.m. - House of Commons "did. I am not going to comment on the policy making process in the run up to the Budget. >> Jessica Toale. >> Thank you, Madam. >> Deputy Speaker. " Saqib Bhatti MP (Meriden and Solihull East, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Jan 2026, 7:52 p.m. - House of Commons "Stephen Doughty Imogen Walker Catherine Atkinson, Jessica Toale, Chris Curtis, DEFRA, Priti Patel " Division - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Jan 2026, 7:52 p.m. - House of Commons "two, three, five and six. That Stephen Doughty Imogen Walker Catherine Atkinson, Jessica Toale " Division - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill
172 speeches (18,623 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Tuesday 20th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Mentions: 1: None That Stephen Doughty, Imogen Walker, Catherine Atkinson, Jessica Toale, Chris Curtis, Priti Patel and - Link to Speech |