Information between 18th November 2024 - 8th December 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
19 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 324 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 350 Noes - 108 |
|
19 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 172 |
|
27 Nov 2024 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 112 Noes - 333 |
|
27 Nov 2024 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 176 |
|
25 Nov 2024 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 335 |
|
25 Nov 2024 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 175 |
|
26 Nov 2024 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 415 Noes - 47 |
|
3 Dec 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 324 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 189 |
|
3 Dec 2024 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 322 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 330 |
|
4 Dec 2024 - Employer National Insurance Contributions - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 334 |
|
4 Dec 2024 - Farming and Inheritance Tax - View Vote Context Jessica Toale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 329 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 339 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Jessica Toale speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Jessica Toale contributed 2 speeches (73 words) Monday 2nd December 2024 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Jessica Toale speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Jessica Toale contributed 1 speech (84 words) Monday 25th November 2024 - Commons Chamber Home Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Conservation Areas
Asked by: Jessica Toale (Labour - Bournemouth West) Monday 2nd December 2024 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of reducing impact risk zones around (a) sites of special scientific interest and (b) special areas of conservation to support appropriate development. Answered by Mary Creagh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Impact Risk Zones (IRZs) are a digital geographical information tool developed by Natural England to help Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) assess the potential risks to Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) from development proposals. They also cover Habitat Sites that are underpinned by a terrestrial SSSI designation, including Special Areas of Conservation.
Natural England supports the delivery of sustainable development by providing advice to LPAs on how to protect and enhance the natural environment. The IRZ tool helps LPAs know when to consult Natural England for advice and is designed to aid better spatial planning and early consideration of the risks to SSSIs to reduce delays in the planning process.
Natural England is satisfied that the zones provide appropriate advice to LPAs but continues to review the evidence that underpins the IRZs to ensure it reflects the latest understanding of SSSI sensitivities. |
| Department Publications - News and Communications |
|---|
|
Thursday 5th December 2024
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Source Page: Called-in decision: 456-472 Oxford Street, London W1 (ref: 3301508 - 5 December 2024) Document: (PDF) Found: Mansell v Tonbridge & Malling BC [2017] EWCA Civ 1314, para. 27 319 As AF explained in XIC 320 Jessica Toale |