To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Green Deal Scheme
Tuesday 9th June 2026

Asked by: Jessica Morden (Labour - Newport East)

Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero:

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what steps he is taking to address cases under the Green Deal and related domestic retrofit schemes where a homeowner was not correctly registered as the energy generator at commissioning; whether he will establish a mechanism for retrospective correction or redress in such cases; and how accountability is assigned when mis‑registration occurs outside standard commercial assignment arrangements.

Answered by Martin McCluskey - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

The Green Deal scheme has its own retrospective redress system whereby complaints can be referred to the Secretary of State in accordance with the Green Deal Framework Regulations and Code of Practice. Lack of registration of the homeowner as the FIT generator, due to misregistration or reassignment of associated rights to a third party, may contribute to finding breaches of said regulations if resulting from the consumer being misled. As part of a wider mis-selling investigation the Secretary of State may issue decisions cancelling or reducing a Green Deal loan, but separate FIT dispute resolution options are also outlined on Ofgem’s website.


Scheduled Event - Monday 8th June - Add to calendar
View Source
Commons - Motion on behalf of the Committee of Selection - Main Chamber
Backbench Business Committee
MP: Jessica Morden
Scheduled Event - Monday 8th June - Add to calendar
View Source
Commons - Motion on behalf of the Committee of Selection - Main Chamber
Environmental Audit Committee
MP: Jessica Morden
Division Vote (Commons)
8 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Jessica Morden (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 247 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 145 Noes - 251
Division Vote (Commons)
8 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Jessica Morden (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 247 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 81 Noes - 266
Division Vote (Commons)
8 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Jessica Morden (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 248 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 257
Division Vote (Commons)
3 Jun 2026 - Agriculture - View Vote Context
Jessica Morden (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 153
Division Vote (Commons)
2 Jun 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context
Jessica Morden (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 80 Noes - 298
Division Vote (Commons)
2 Jun 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context
Jessica Morden (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 371
Division Vote (Commons)
2 Jun 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context
Jessica Morden (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 301