To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Freehold and Property Management Companies: Misconduct
Wednesday 21st February 2024

Asked by: Janet Daby (Labour - Lewisham East)

Question to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities:

To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, how many cases of (a) freehold and (b) management company misconduct have been reported in the last 12 months.

Answered by Lee Rowley

There is no one set of information which captures the full extent of leaseholder concerns as these come in many forms.

Leaseholders have a number of routes to redress including challenging the reasonableness of costs or services provided at the Property Tribunal, making a complaint through a freeholder or managing agent’s own complaints procedures, or using a government approved redress scheme of which all managing agents must belong by law.

Through the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill the Government will expand routes of redress for leaseholders where their landlord carries out their own management of the building by requiring these landlords to join a redress scheme.


Written Question
Private Rented Housing: Mould
Wednesday 21st February 2024

Asked by: Janet Daby (Labour - Lewisham East)

Question to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities:

To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, whether his Department plans to take steps to support tenants of private landlords to take action against landlords who (a) refuse to act and (b) delay acting on cases of (i) damp and (ii) mould.

Answered by Jacob Young

We have been very clear that where landlords of private rented sector properties fail to act on damp and mould, local authorities must support tenants by holding landlords to account, including taking enforcement action where necessary.


Written Question
Youth Custody
Monday 19th February 2024

Asked by: Janet Daby (Labour - Lewisham East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the average cost to the public purse is of a person aged 18 or over being placed in the children’s secure estate.

Answered by Edward Argar - Shadow Secretary of State for Justice

I refer the honourable Member to the answer I gave to Question 8178 on 11 January 2024: Written questions and answers - Written questions, answers and statements - UK Parliament.

There is no difference in the average cost to public purse if an 18-year-old remains within the youth secure estate upon reaching the age of 18. Newly-sentenced or remanded 18-year-olds are placed into adult establishments.


Written Question
Secure Training Centres and Young Offender Institutions: Safety
Monday 19th February 2024

Asked by: Janet Daby (Labour - Lewisham East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many safeguarding referrals have been made from each (a) young offender institution and (b) secure training centre for people aged 18 or over in each of the last five years.

Answered by Edward Argar - Shadow Secretary of State for Justice

The data requested are set out in the following tables:

Young Offender Institutions

2020

2021

2022

2023

Cookham Wood

8

*

25

22

Feltham A

10

10

12

28

Parc YPU

0

0

*

15

Werrington

*

7

*

29

Wetherby

14

36

32

61


Secure Training Centres

2020

2021

2022

2023

Oakhill

8

*

0

9

Rainsbrook

13

9

-

-

Notes

1. The symbol * is used for suppressed values of 5 or fewer, to prevent disclosure in accordance with data protection principles. Zero figures are not suppressed.

2. Rainsbrook Secure Training Centre closed in December 2021.

3. Please note that the above is classed as internal management information.

4. Following Urgent Notification at Oakhill Secure Training Centre in October 2021, safeguarding data recording processes were reviewed and central collation of this data was ceased for the period of October - December 2021. Safeguarding processes were maintained locally for the period and following revision, central data collation recommenced in January 2022.

When a safeguarding case is opened, the detail of the case may not be known. We conduct a thorough investigation of every case to understand the details and the severity of the concern and ensure that any necessary actions are taken to protect the children in our custody. It is not the case that an increase in safeguarding cases should always be a matter of concern: this would be dependent on the nature of the case. An increased number of cases may represent increased confidence on the part of staff in reporting concerns or may indicate that children feel safe to disclose information to staff. It is by conducting a thorough investigation that we can understand the nature of each case and identify any trends that need to be addressed.


Written Question
Youth Custody
Monday 19th February 2024

Asked by: Janet Daby (Labour - Lewisham East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether he has made an estimate of the number of young people aged 18 or over in the youth secure estate who have been separated from their peers for more than seven days in the last 12 months.

Answered by Edward Argar - Shadow Secretary of State for Justice

The latest 12-month period for which data are available is 01 April 2022 to 31 March 2023. During that period, 56 young people aged 18 or over in the youth secure estate were separated for more than seven days. All of these were in young offender institutions.

In making the above calculation, the following rules were applied:

  • Where a period of separation began before 01 April 2022, the full duration of the separation has been counted.
  • Where a period of separation began before 31 March 2023, it is deemed to have ended on 31 March 2023 for the purpose of this calculation.
  • The data provided relate to continuous periods of separation of more than seven days.
  • If a new period of separation began within five days of a previous period of separation’s ending, it is deemed to be a single continuous period of separation.
  • Young people aged 17 when their separation began, but who turned 18 more than seven days before the separation ended have been counted.

On 31 December 2023, there were 153 young people aged 18 or over in the youth estate. Details of their ethnicity and religious affiliation are provided in the following tables.

Number of 18+ year olds by ethnic group, December 2023

Number of 18+ year olds

Asian

8

Black

48

Mixed

22

Not Known

*

Other

*

White

69

Grand Total

153


Note
The symbol * is used for suppressed values of five or fewer, to prevent disclosure in accordance with data protection principles. Zero figures are not suppressed.

Number of 18+ year olds by religious group, December 2023

Number of 18+ year olds

No Religion

24

Christian

55

Muslim

22

Other religion

10

Religion not stated

42

Grand Total

153

As of 06 February 2024, the oldest young person accommodated in the youth estate was 18 years old.


Written Question
Youth Custody
Monday 19th February 2024

Asked by: Janet Daby (Labour - Lewisham East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many young people aged 18 or over from each (a) ethnic group and (b) religion were in the youth estate as of 31 December 2023.

Answered by Edward Argar - Shadow Secretary of State for Justice

The latest 12-month period for which data are available is 01 April 2022 to 31 March 2023. During that period, 56 young people aged 18 or over in the youth secure estate were separated for more than seven days. All of these were in young offender institutions.

In making the above calculation, the following rules were applied:

  • Where a period of separation began before 01 April 2022, the full duration of the separation has been counted.
  • Where a period of separation began before 31 March 2023, it is deemed to have ended on 31 March 2023 for the purpose of this calculation.
  • The data provided relate to continuous periods of separation of more than seven days.
  • If a new period of separation began within five days of a previous period of separation’s ending, it is deemed to be a single continuous period of separation.
  • Young people aged 17 when their separation began, but who turned 18 more than seven days before the separation ended have been counted.

On 31 December 2023, there were 153 young people aged 18 or over in the youth estate. Details of their ethnicity and religious affiliation are provided in the following tables.

Number of 18+ year olds by ethnic group, December 2023

Number of 18+ year olds

Asian

8

Black

48

Mixed

22

Not Known

*

Other

*

White

69

Grand Total

153


Note
The symbol * is used for suppressed values of five or fewer, to prevent disclosure in accordance with data protection principles. Zero figures are not suppressed.

Number of 18+ year olds by religious group, December 2023

Number of 18+ year olds

No Religion

24

Christian

55

Muslim

22

Other religion

10

Religion not stated

42

Grand Total

153

As of 06 February 2024, the oldest young person accommodated in the youth estate was 18 years old.


Written Question
Youth Custody
Monday 19th February 2024

Asked by: Janet Daby (Labour - Lewisham East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what is the age of the oldest individual placed in the youth secure estate as of 6 February 2024.

Answered by Edward Argar - Shadow Secretary of State for Justice

The latest 12-month period for which data are available is 01 April 2022 to 31 March 2023. During that period, 56 young people aged 18 or over in the youth secure estate were separated for more than seven days. All of these were in young offender institutions.

In making the above calculation, the following rules were applied:

  • Where a period of separation began before 01 April 2022, the full duration of the separation has been counted.
  • Where a period of separation began before 31 March 2023, it is deemed to have ended on 31 March 2023 for the purpose of this calculation.
  • The data provided relate to continuous periods of separation of more than seven days.
  • If a new period of separation began within five days of a previous period of separation’s ending, it is deemed to be a single continuous period of separation.
  • Young people aged 17 when their separation began, but who turned 18 more than seven days before the separation ended have been counted.

On 31 December 2023, there were 153 young people aged 18 or over in the youth estate. Details of their ethnicity and religious affiliation are provided in the following tables.

Number of 18+ year olds by ethnic group, December 2023

Number of 18+ year olds

Asian

8

Black

48

Mixed

22

Not Known

*

Other

*

White

69

Grand Total

153


Note
The symbol * is used for suppressed values of five or fewer, to prevent disclosure in accordance with data protection principles. Zero figures are not suppressed.

Number of 18+ year olds by religious group, December 2023

Number of 18+ year olds

No Religion

24

Christian

55

Muslim

22

Other religion

10

Religion not stated

42

Grand Total

153

As of 06 February 2024, the oldest young person accommodated in the youth estate was 18 years old.


Written Question
Anti-social Behaviour: Police
Wednesday 14th February 2024

Asked by: Janet Daby (Labour - Lewisham East)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment the Government has made of the potential impact of trends in levels of financial settlements for local authorities on trends in levels of neighbourhood disputes involving police since 2010.

Answered by Laura Farris

The Government has not conducted analysis on potential impact of trends in levels of financial settlements for local authorities since 2010 on trends in levels of neighbourhood disputes involving police.

This Government has supported the police by giving them the resources they need. We have confirmed a total police funding settlement of up to £18.4 billion for 2024-25, an increase of up to £842.9 million when compared to 2023-24.

Assuming full take up of precept flexibility, overall police funding available to PCCs will increase by up to £922.2 million (6.0% in cash terms).

Decisions on how to use funding and resources are an operational matter for Chief Constables. Police and Crime Commissioners are best placed to make resourcing decisions within their communities based on their local knowledge and experience.


Written Question
Dental Services: Young Offender Institutions
Wednesday 14th February 2024

Asked by: Janet Daby (Labour - Lewisham East)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of dentistry provision in the youth secure estate.

Answered by Andrea Leadsom

NHS England has statutory responsibility for the direct commissioning of health services in the children and young people secure estate. Intercollegiate Healthcare Standards for children and young people in secure settings were first published in 2013 to support high quality healthcare provision for children in secure settings, and were refreshed in 2023. These standards are available at the following link:

https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/resources/healthcare-standards-children-young-people-secure-settings

They formed the basis of an outcome-based dental service specification, which is available at the following link:

https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/health-and-justice-and-armed-forces-service-specifications-for-children-and-young-people-in-secure-settings/#:~:text=Health%20and%20justice%20service%20specifications%20for%20children%20and%20young%20people%20in%20secure%20settings,-Document%20first%20published&text=This%20suite%20of%20specifications%20includes,dental%20and%20oral%20health%20specifications.

All children in the secure estate receive individualised care according to need and following an assessment via the Comprehensive Health Assessment Tool. This is an evidence based, validated health assessment tool for under 18-year-olds, which screens for physical health, substance misuse, mental health and neurodisability. This would include any dental care needs.


Written Question
Prison Officers: Dismissal
Wednesday 14th February 2024

Asked by: Janet Daby (Labour - Lewisham East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prison officers have been dismissed for (a) supplying and (b) transporting drugs in the youth secure estate in each of the last 10 years.

Answered by Edward Argar - Shadow Secretary of State for Justice

The vast majority of prison staff are hardworking and dedicated. A minority of staff engage in corrupt activity which is often as a result of conditioning and manipulation by prisoners.

HM Prison & Probation Service has a zero-tolerance policy to drugs conveyed into prisons and take appropriate action to a small number of prison staff who break the rules. Our £100m Security Investment Programme, aimed at reducing crime in prisons, including reducing the conveyance of illicit items such as drugs and mobile phones, is ongoing. This includes increased resource to pursue corruption, as well as established a new ‘Prevent’ function, aimed at building staff resilience against corruption.

Below is a table showing the breakdown of staff dismissed from 2019 to Dec 2023 within the Youth Custody Service (YCS) for drug related offences.

Table 1

Year

Conveyance of drugs

TOTAL

1

2019

0

2020

0

2021

1

2022

0

2023

0

Source: Linkspace Case Management System.

Notes:

Linkspace is the Counter Corruption Unit’s (CCU) Case Management System used to record and track cases linked to corruption.

Data provided by the CCU have the following Caveats applied below;

1) The new Counter Corruption Unit came into being in April 2019, with a new structure and a change to ways of working. During the initial transition period, and prior to the introduction of the new Case Management System, it is possible that not all arrests were being captured.

2) Prior to April 2019, corruption in HMPPS was managed by the Corruption Prevention Unit (CPU). The CPU was a largely centralised unit focused on sanitising and disseminating all corruption related intelligence to the Police, with an individual Regional Corruption Prevention Manager (RCPM) in each geographical region offering advice and support to prisons in managing corruption, Hence data prior to April 2019 is not available.

3) Data includes Non-Directly Employed Staff (public or private) as they provide a service on behalf of HMPPS.

4) ‘Supplying and transporting’ of drugs in a prison falls under the definition of ‘conveyance of drugs’ and recorded on the CCU’s Case Management System to cases linked to drugs related offences.