Information between 20th November 2025 - 30th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Thursday 11th December 2025 James MacCleary (Liberal Democrat - Lewes) General debate - Main Chamber Subject: General debate on the impact of foreign interference on security, trade and democracy View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Nov 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context James MacCleary voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 56 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16 |
|
20 Nov 2025 - Telecommunications - View Vote Context James MacCleary voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 56 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context James MacCleary voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 367 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context James MacCleary voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 56 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 309 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context James MacCleary voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 58 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 311 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context James MacCleary voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 58 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 318 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context James MacCleary voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 67 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 320 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context James MacCleary voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 67 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 179 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context James MacCleary voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 68 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 320 |
|
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context James MacCleary voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 66 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 321 |
| Written Answers | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Armed Forces: Housing
Asked by: James MacCleary (Liberal Democrat - Lewes) Wednesday 26th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many notices to quit have been issued by the Defence Infrastructure Organisation to service families in Service Family Accommodation properties in the UK in each month since January 2023. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Defence Infrastructure Organisation does not issue Notices to Quit to Service families living in Service Family Accommodation. Instead, it issues Notices to Vacate to Service personnel.
Notices to Quit are only issued – where and when appropriate – to civilian sublet tenants, Afghan Resettlement Programme tenants, and farming tenants occupying Ministry of Defence properties and land. |
||||||||
|
NHS: Workplace Pensions
Asked by: James MacCleary (Liberal Democrat - Lewes) Monday 24th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, when members of the NHS Pensions Scheme will receive McCloud remedies. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department recognises the importance of providing NHS Pension Scheme members certainty about when they will receive their McCloud Remediable Service Statements. An independent review of the NHS Business Service Authority’s (NHSBSA) revised plans for the delivery of the McCloud remedy for NHS Pension Scheme members is underway. This will provide an additional level of scrutiny and assurance of the NHSBSA’s delivery plan and the timetable for the remaining statements. I expect to be able to update the House on the review’s progress and the remedy delivery timetable before Christmas recess. In the meantime, the NHSBSA continues to provide Remediable Service Statements to affected members, prioritising those who may be experiencing immediate financial hardship due to the discrimination highlighted by the McCloud judgment. Additionally, members who meet specific criteria can request to receive a prioritised Remediable Service Statement. Further information is available at the following link: https://faq.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/knowledgebase/article/KA-29429/en-us The Government is committed to ensuring that affected members are not subject to financial disadvantage due to these delays. Pension arrears arising from the McCloud remedy are paid with 8% interest, and a compensation scheme is available for members who have experienced other direct financial losses. |
||||||||
|
Teachers: Workplace Pensions
Asked by: James MacCleary (Liberal Democrat - Lewes) Monday 24th November 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 20 October 2025 to Question 80538 on Teachers: Workplace Pensions, whether Teachers' Pensions plan to inform retired teachers of the timeline for receipt of rollback statements. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) Recalculating benefits for retired members is a complex process, requiring adjustments for tax, interest, and system functionality once a member has received their Remediable Service Statement (RSS) and responded with their remedy period choice. Although the administrator resumed issuing Remediable Service Statements earlier this year, not all cases could be completed within the original timeframe. The administrator will keep affected members informed of revised timelines through established channels, including ‘My Pension Online’ and the Teachers’ Pensions website. The latest update is available here: https://www.teacherspensions.co.uk/news/public-news/2025/07/remediable-service-statement-rss-choices-payments.aspx. As responsibility for this work transitions to the new administrator of the Teachers’ Pension Scheme in summer 2026, the department is working with Tata Consultancy Services to finalise the timeline for issuing all RSSs. Once the timeline is confirmed, it will be communicated to relevant members. The department continues to monitor progress and is working closely with the scheme administrator to streamline processes and introduce automation where possible. Any pension adjustments arising from members’ choices will be backdated with interest to ensure members are not financially disadvantaged. |
||||||||
|
Supported Housing: Older People
Asked by: James MacCleary (Liberal Democrat - Lewes) Tuesday 25th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps his Department is taking to increase the accessibility of specialist housing-with-care to older people. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) I refer the hon. Member to the answers given to Questions UIN 61360 on 30 June 2025, UIN 61666 on 30 June 2025, UIN 59953 on 23 June 2025, and UIN 40972 on 1 April 2025. |
||||||||
|
Afghanistan: Resettlement
Asked by: James MacCleary (Liberal Democrat - Lewes) Tuesday 25th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many Afghan nationals have been offered sanctuary under (a) the Afghan Relocations and Resettlement scheme, (b) ARAP and (c) ACRS; how many of those remain in Afghanistan; and what assessment he has made of the risks to those Afghans following the recent data breach. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) Though in previous responses to Parliamentary Questions the Department have released internal ARAP data, as the Home Office now publish Afghanistan Resettlement Programme (ARP) data on behalf of the Government, the number of Afghan nationals who have been offered relocation and have resettled in the UK can be found in the Home Office statistics linked below. Information relating to the number of Afghans who remain in Afghanistan who have received an offer of relocation has been withheld as release would risk revealing the identity and the safety of those relocating. Furthermore, this release would be likely to damage UK interests abroad.
Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/immigration-statistics-quarterly-release
The UK made an ambitious and generous commitment to help at-risk people in Afghanistan and, so far, we have brought around 38,700 people to safety, including thousands of people eligible for our Afghan schemes.
Afghanistan Resettlement Schemes operational data is published quarterly with the last publication on the 21 August 2025.
The data published within the immigration system statistics release (year ending June 2025, published 21 August 2025) provides a breakdown of arrivals by quarter.
The number of individuals resettled under the schemes is as follows: 19,048 under ARAP. 10,160 individuals under ACRS Pathway 1, 1,406 individuals under ACRS Pathway 2 and 1,679 individuals under ACRS Pathway 3.
As recognised by the Rimmer Review, the human rights picture in Afghanistan was dire, prior to and regardless of the data loss incident.
However, while Afghanistan remains a dangerous place, the Rimmer Review does conclude that it is “highly unlikely” that merely being on the dataset would be grounds for targeting, and that it is unlikely that family members will be targeted simply because the principal appears in the dataset. It also concludes that the dataset is unlikely to substantially change an individual’s existing exposure given the volume of data already available to the Taleban and the fact that links to the former Government are widely known.
|
||||||||
|
ERCAS BV and RUK Advanced Systems
Asked by: James MacCleary (Liberal Democrat - Lewes) Tuesday 25th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will list the meetings and communications his Department has had with (a) ERCAS BV and (b) RUK Advance Systems Limited in each of the last three years. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) I can confirm that the Ministry of Defece (MOD) hold no direct contracts with ERCAS BV or RUK Advance Systems Limited. A list of the meetings held with each company is not held centrally by MOD and the information could only be gathered at disproportionate cost.
|
||||||||
|
Ministry of Defence: Data Protection
Asked by: James MacCleary (Liberal Democrat - Lewes) Wednesday 26th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, the total number of assessed MoD data breaches since July 2025. Answered by Al Carns - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) (Minister for Veterans) 201 personal data breaches were assessed between 1 July 2025 and 23 November 2025 by security personnel and subjected to an initial security risk assessment. Any further action would be taken on a proportionate basis. No data incidents between those dates were assessed as meeting the threshold for reporting to the Information Commissioner’s Office. |
||||||||
|
Military Bases: Trespass
Asked by: James MacCleary (Liberal Democrat - Lewes) Friday 28th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many break-ins were detected at Royal Air Force bases in the UK in each year since 2022. Answered by Al Carns - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) (Minister for Veterans) The number of break-ins detected at Royal Air Forces bases in the UK in each year since 2022 is as follows:
The data provided is where the incident has been recorded as a trespass or an intruder on the site with some evidence of unauthorised forced entry.
The safety and security of the Defence estate continues to be a key priority for Defence and we are taking decisive action to strengthen security across our estate, reversing years of under-investment and focusing our resources on our highest priority sites.
The Department is using in-year funding to deliver physical security enhancements, focussing on high priority sites across the defence estate. We have delivered urgent physical enhancements, introduced advanced surveillance technology such as the Immediate Threat Mitigation Solution, and we are investing £20 million in digital transformation to modernise our approach. Enhanced vigilance, updated guidance, and improved reporting have made it easier for personnel and industry partners to report incidents, while successful recruitment campaigns are increasing our policing and guard capacity.
The Strategic Defence Review recognised that we are in a new era of threat, which demands a new era for UK Defence.
We remain committed to maintaining the highest standards of security to safeguard our national defence capabilities.
|
||||||||
|
Military Bases: Trespass
Asked by: James MacCleary (Liberal Democrat - Lewes) Friday 28th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many break-ins were detected at Royal Navy bases in the UK in each year since 2022. Answered by Al Carns - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) (Minister for Veterans) The number of break-ins detected at Royal Navy bases in the UK in each year since 2022 is as follows:
The data provided is where the incident has been recorded as a trespass or an intruder on the site with some evidence of unauthorised forced entry.
The safety and security of the Defence estate continues to be a priority key for Defence and we are taking decisive action to strengthen security across our estate, reversing years of under-investment and focusing our resources on our highest priority sites.
The Department is using in-year funding to deliver physical security enhancements, focussing on high priority sites across the defence estate. We have delivered urgent physical enhancements, introduced advanced surveillance technology such as the Immediate Threat Mitigation Solution, and we are investing £20 million in digital transformation to modernise our approach. Enhanced vigilance, updated guidance, and improved reporting have made it easier for personnel and industry partners to report incidents, while successful recruitment campaigns are increasing our policing and guard capacity.
The Strategic Defence Review recognised that we are in a new era of threat, which demands a new era for UK Defence.
We remain committed to maintaining the highest standards of security to safeguard our national defence capabilities.
|
||||||||
|
Military Bases: Trespass
Asked by: James MacCleary (Liberal Democrat - Lewes) Friday 28th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many break-ins were detected at British Army bases in the UK in each year since 2022. Answered by Al Carns - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) (Minister for Veterans) The number of break-ins detected at British Army bases in the UK in each year since 2022 is as follows:
The data provided is where the incident has been recorded as a trespass or an intruder on the site with some evidence of unauthorised entry.
The Department is using in-year funding to deliver physical security enhancements, focussing on high priority sites across the defence estate. We have delivered urgent physical enhancements, introduced advanced surveillance technology such as the Immediate Threat Mitigation Solution, and we are investing £20 million in digital transformation to modernise our approach. Enhanced vigilance, updated guidance, and improved reporting have made it easier for personnel and industry partners to report incidents, while successful recruitment campaigns are increasing our policing and guard capacity.
The Strategic Defence Review recognised that we are in a new era of threat, which demands a new era for UK Defence.
We remain committed to maintaining the highest standards of security to safeguard our national defence capabilities.
|
||||||||
|
Military Bases: Trespass
Asked by: James MacCleary (Liberal Democrat - Lewes) Friday 28th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps his Department is taking to stop trespass on military training grounds. Answered by Al Carns - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) (Minister for Veterans) Defence is taking decisive action to strengthen security across our estate. The Department is committed to safeguarding UK military training grounds from unauthorised access through a combination of physical security measures, legal enforcement, and community engagement.
To further enhance security, the Ministry of Defence ensures increased visible patrols, maintains guard readiness, regularly inspects and maintains CCTV, gates, and barriers, and promotes heightened security awareness across the Defence Estate. This Government has also delivered significant physical enhancements, introduced advanced surveillance technology such as the Immediate Threat Mitigation Solution, and we are investing £20million in digital transformation to modernise our approach.
As part of the Respect the Range campaign, tailored communication packages are delivered to educate the public on safety measures and the importance of adhering to guidelines near the training estate. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 1st September James MacCleary signed this EDM on Thursday 11th December 2025 Armed Forces Training Contract and Elbit Systems 53 signatures (Most recent: 11 Dec 2025)Tabled by: Brian Leishman (Labour - Alloa and Grangemouth) That this House is deeply concerned by reports that the Ministry of Defence is considering awarding a £2 billion, 15-year Army Collective Training Service contract to Elbit Systems UK, a wholly owned subsidiary of Elbit Systems Limited, Israel’s largest arms manufacturer; notes that Elbit supplies 85 per cent of the … |
| Parliamentary Research |
|---|
|
English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill 2024-26: progress of the bill - CBP-10401
Nov. 20 2025 Found: priorities in areas such as advanced manufacturing, clean energy and digital innovation”.15 James MacCleary |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 3 p.m. Finance Committee (Commons) - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th February 2026 3 p.m. Finance Committee (Commons) - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Tuesday 25th November 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-11-25 16:15:00+00:00 Savings Inquiry - Finance Committee (Commons) |
|
Tuesday 25th November 2025
Scrutiny evidence - Oral Evidence Panel 1 – Tuesday 25 October 2025 Finance Committee (Commons) |
|
Tuesday 25th November 2025
Scrutiny evidence - Oral Evidence – Tuesday 25 October 2025 Finance Committee (Commons) |
|
Tuesday 25th November 2025
Oral Evidence - 2025-11-25 15:15:00+00:00 Savings Inquiry - Finance Committee (Commons) |
|
Friday 5th December 2025
Written Evidence - Hleb Buziuk FSI0001 - Finance Committee Savings Inquiry Savings Inquiry - Finance Committee (Commons) |
|
Friday 5th December 2025
Written Evidence - House of Commons Trade Union Side FSI0003 - Finance Committee Savings Inquiry Savings Inquiry - Finance Committee (Commons) |
|
Friday 5th December 2025
Written Evidence - House of Commons FSI0002 - Finance Committee Savings Inquiry Savings Inquiry - Finance Committee (Commons) |