Information between 5th October 2025 - 25th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context James Frith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 327 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context James Frith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 333 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 160 Noes - 324 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 151 Noes - 319 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 316 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 319 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 321 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 171 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 322 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 174 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 381 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 307 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 389 Noes - 102 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 390 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 313 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context James Frith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 317 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Asthma: Medical Equipment
Asked by: James Frith (Labour - Bury North) Monday 13th October 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of providing free prescriptions for inhalers to people with asthma who are moving into adulthood. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) There are no plans to review the list of medical conditions that entitle someone to apply for a medical exemption certificate. There are extensive arrangements in place in England to ensure that prescriptions are affordable for everyone. Approximately 89% of prescription items are dispensed free of charge in the community in England, and there are a wide range of exemptions from prescription charges already in place for which those with asthma may be eligible. Eligibility depends on the patient’s age, whether they are in qualifying full-time education, whether they are pregnant or have recently given birth, or whether they are in receipt of certain benefits or a war pension. People on low incomes can apply for help with their health costs through the NHS Low Income Scheme, which provides help based on a comparison between a person’s income and their requirements. People who need to pay and who need many prescription items could save money with a prescription prepayment certificate (PPC). PPCs allow people to claim as many prescriptions as needed for a set cost. An annual PPC costs £114.50 and will save money if they need 12 or more items in 12 months. To help spread the cost, people can pay for an annual PPC through 10 monthly direct debits, which works out as just over £2 per week. A three month PPC for £32.05 is also available. |
|
Foreign Companies: Location
Asked by: James Frith (Labour - Bury North) Wednesday 15th October 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, with reference to the Independent Expert Panel on Corporate Re-domiciliation report, published on 14 October 2024, whether he plans to consult on the proposed UK corporate re-domiciliation regime. Answered by Blair McDougall - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) In a written statement on 14 October 2024, the Department welcomed the Independent Expert Panel’s report and committed to consulting on the design of a proposed corporate re-domiciliation regime for the UK, in due course, as part of wider company law reform. |