Debates between James Cleverly and Kirsteen Sullivan during the 2024 Parliament

Representation of the People Bill

Debate between James Cleverly and Kirsteen Sullivan
James Cleverly Portrait Sir James Cleverly
- Hansard - -

It seems that no Labour Members are willing to address the point that I have raised. This is a really simple binary choice. As I have said, both domestically and internationally, 16 and 17-year-olds are defined as children. I have asked this question multiple times, but Labour Members will not address it.

James Cleverly Portrait Sir James Cleverly
- Hansard - -

Perhaps the hon. Lady will have a go. Go on!

Kirsteen Sullivan Portrait Kirsteen Sullivan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does the right hon. Gentleman recognise the valuable contribution that young people in Scotland have made to the democratic process, first in 2014, when they were able to vote in the independence referendum, and subsequently in Scottish local and parliamentary elections? Does he value their contribution?

James Cleverly Portrait Sir James Cleverly
- Hansard - -

I value the contribution of people in this country whether they are or are not able to vote, but again, that does not address the point. I am going to move on now, because it is clear that Labour Members either will not or cannot address it. They do not seem to know whether they are giving votes to children or stripping childhood from 16 and 17-year-olds.