Oral Answers to Questions

Jack Lopresti Excerpts

Tuesday 25th March 2014 Commons Chamber

[Jason McCartney (Colne Valley) (Con)]

2. What assessment he has made of the legal implications for the UK of Russia’s recognition of Crimea as a sovereign state.

[Jack Lopresti (Filton and Bradley Stoke) (Con)]

3. What assessment he has made of the legal implications for the UK of Russia’s recognition of Crimea as a sovereign state.

[The Attorney-General (Mr Dominic Grieve)]

The steps taken by President Putin to annex Crimea to Russia, including recognition of Crimea as a sovereign state, are a flagrant breach of international law and Russia’s international obligations. The United Kingdom, in common with the European Union and the majority of the international community, does not recognise the 16 March Crimea referendum or its outcome as legitimate or of any credibility or value. As has been made clear by my right hon. Friends the Prime Minister and the Foreign Secretary at this Dispatch Box, Russian actions threaten the rules-based system of international order, a fundamental principle of which is respect for the territorial integrity of states.

[The Attorney-General]

I agree entirely with my hon. Friend. As he is aware from what the Prime Minister said, there was no basis or justification for Russia’s actions in Crimea, even before it moved on to annexation. Its decisions to do that are, as I said, in flagrant breach of its international legal obligations. The United Kingdom is co-operating with other states, including those of the G7 and the European Union, in making clear that such behaviour is unacceptable, and that there will continue to be consequences for as long as Russia does not de-escalate the crisis.

[Jack Lopresti]

Does my right hon. and learned Friend agree that it is more important than ever that we depend on the stability and security of the international order?

[The Attorney-General]

I agree entirely with my hon. Friend. Although at times people call into question the mechanisms of international order under the charter of the United Nations, or in a European Context those of the Council of Europe, they have delivered over time real improvements in the way in which states behave towards each other. That is why the actions of the Russian Government in tearing up the rule book in this way are so sinister and so chilling.