Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Ian Lavery

Main Page: Ian Lavery (Labour - Wansbeck)

Oral Answers to Questions

Ian Lavery Excerpts
Thursday 3rd April 2014

(10 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman is very knowledgeable about such matters, but our plans for the capacity market are on schedule, so the fears that he voices are not there. He talks about the benefits of a strategic reserve, which we debated during the passage of the Bill that became the Energy Act 2013, but what National Grid and Ofgem are doing in the short term has similarities with a strategic reserve, yet avoids the disadvantage of creating perverse incentives for the wider energy market.

Ian Lavery Portrait Ian Lavery (Wansbeck) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Does the Secretary of State agree that security of supply will not be enhanced by the closure of two of the last three deep mines, Kellingley and Thoresby, and open-cast mines? Bearing in mind the fact that the Government have taken £4.5 billion from the mineworkers’ pension scheme, including £700 million this year, surely it is not beyond their imagination to use the miners’ own money to support what is left of the industry.

Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We do not see a security of supply problem here, but the Government need to engage with all parties to determine what we can do, and we have been incredibly active in doing so.