Military Action Overseas: Parliamentary Approval Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Military Action Overseas: Parliamentary Approval

Iain Duncan Smith Excerpts
Tuesday 17th April 2018

(6 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jeremy Corbyn Portrait Jeremy Corbyn
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Indeed, my hon. Friend is right. There is an established convention, and I fear that the Government were trying to breach that convention with their actions yesterday. I welcome the parliamentary convention that has developed since the Iraq war, whereby the Government are expected to seek the approval of the House before they commit forces to action.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I hope it is a point of order.

Iain Duncan Smith Portrait Mr Duncan Smith
- Hansard - -

It is. Following the intervention by the hon. Member for Cardiff West (Kevin Brennan), I wish to clarify the difference between this most recent operation and what happened in 2013—

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. No, that is not a point of order.

Iain Duncan Smith Portrait Mr Duncan Smith
- Hansard - -

indicated dissent.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

First, the right hon. Gentleman should sit down when I am on my feet. Secondly, in deference to his very great seniority, I will hear him if it is a short sentence.

Iain Duncan Smith Portrait Mr Duncan Smith
- Hansard - -

In 2013, America and Britain had not gone to the UN and were planning to; with this most recent operation, we had been to the UN and it had been vetoed.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is an extremely interesting debating point but, if I put it very politely, as a point of order I am afraid it would be, in old-fashioned O-level terms, an unclassified.

--- Later in debate ---
James Heappey Portrait James Heappey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will my right hon. Friend give way?

Baroness May of Maidenhead Portrait The Prime Minister
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will make just a little more progress.

As the exception makes clear, there are also situations when coming to Parliament in advance would undermine the security of our operations or constrain our armed forces’ ability to act quickly and decisively. In these situations, it is right for the Prime Minister to take the decision and then to be held accountable to Parliament for it. I give way to my right hon. Friend the Member for Chingford and Woodford Green (Mr Duncan Smith).

Iain Duncan Smith Portrait Mr Duncan Smith
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend; I know she wishes to make progress. I was struck by the intervention by the hon. Member for Nottingham East (Mr Leslie) on his leader when he asked the very specific question about whether, under the motion, any change in embedded forces, for example, would deliver the necessity of a parliamentary vote. May I connect that with the question raised about legislation, because surely it would be the case that had the Government decided not to have a vote, an injunction would almost immediately follow under that legislation, thereby absolutely puncturing a hole through Government action when that was necessary and leaving complete confusion for us and our allies?

Baroness May of Maidenhead Portrait The Prime Minister
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right. In this area in particular, clarity of decision is crucial. It is crucial not just for Government, but for our armed forces personnel, as we are asking them to put their lives on the line for us.