Security Vetting Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Security Vetting

Helen Maguire Excerpts
Monday 20th April 2026

(1 day, 8 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Peter Mandelson got DV clearance before he took up his post as ambassador. That clearance was given by the Foreign Office. I found out that that was against the recommendation on Tuesday evening of last week.

Helen Maguire Portrait Helen Maguire (Epsom and Ewell) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I have two quick questions. First, was the decision not to give Mandelson DV the view of the head of security in the FCDO, or only that of Olly Robbins? Secondly, what information did the Prime Minister know after sacking Peter Mandelson that made him change the appointment process so that

“now an appointment cannot be announced until after security vetting is passed”?

It seems odd to me that this decision was made if the Prime Minister did not know that Peter Mandelson had failed the vetting process, so what key information did the Prime Minister know then that made him review the appointment process?

Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The decision to grant clearance was made by the FCDO. In September, it became clear to me that the answers to the due diligence that Peter Mandelson had given were not truthful, and that is why I set in place the various reviews that I did and also changed the approach in relation to when developed vetting checks are carried out.