Oral Answers to Questions

Gregory Stafford Excerpts
Tuesday 22nd October 2024

(2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Nigel Farage Portrait Nigel Farage (Clacton) (Reform)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

3. What the planned timetable is for implementing the agreement with Mauritius on the sovereignty of the British Indian Ocean Territory.

Gregory Stafford Portrait Gregory Stafford (Farnham and Bordon) (Con)
- Hansard - -

20. What assessment he has made of the potential security implications of the agreement with Mauritius on sovereignty of the British Indian Ocean Territory.

--- Later in debate ---
Stephen Doughty Portrait Stephen Doughty
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

We note the reports with significant concern, but the hon. Gentleman will understand that I am not going to comment on an ongoing police investigation. As I pointed out yesterday, the reports relate to historical conversations, not during the current round of negotiations. We are confident that we have achieved a treaty that meets our national security objectives, closes off a migration route and fundamentally respects the interests of the Chagossian people.

Gregory Stafford Portrait Gregory Stafford
- View Speech - Hansard - -

How can the Minister continue to defend the ceding of the Chagos islands to Mauritius when China is rapidly expanding its influence in the Indo-Pacific? With no binding agreement against Chinese military involvement in the future, have the Government recklessly compromised British and allied security just to appease vested interests?

Stephen Doughty Portrait Stephen Doughty
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I completely reject what the hon. Gentleman suggests about Mauritius somehow being in hock to China or the agreement somehow opening up a place for China. Let me be clear: Mauritius is one of only two African countries that have not signed up to the belt and road initiative. There is absolutely no way that we, or the United States, would have signed off a treaty across the national security apparatus that compromised any of our security interests or those of our allies. The unequivocal support from the United States—the President, the Secretary of State, the Defence Secretary and across the establishment—makes it clear that this is the right deal for our security and that of our allies.