To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Leisure: Business Rates
Thursday 5th February 2026

Asked by: Graham Stuart (Conservative - Beverley and Holderness)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of excluding soft play centres and other family focused venues from the 15 per cent business rates discount for pubs and music venues on those businesses; and whether she plans to extend equivalent relief to venues serving children, parents and carers.

Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

Pubs rents in business rates valuations are analysed differently to some other sectors. While most hospitality and leisure properties are valued by comparing the size of the property, pubs are valued by comparing their turnover potential. Industry bodies have highlighted concerns with how costs are accounted for in this methodology, particularly during periods of high inflation. There is significant overlap between the pub sector and live music venues, with many pubs serving as grassroots live music venues, meaning they are often valued for business rates purposes in a similar way.

The new pubs and live music venues relief is on top of the £4.3 billion support package announced at the Budget to support ratepayers across all sectors seeing bill increases. As a result of the Budget package, over half of ratepayers will see no bill increases. This also means most properties seeing increases will see them capped at 15% or less next year, or £800 for the smallest.

The Government is also introducing new permanently lower tax rates for eligible retail, hospitality and leisure (RHL) properties, including soft play centres. These new tax rates are worth nearly £1 billion per year, and will benefit over 750,000 properties.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 04 Feb 2026
Lord Mandelson

"The right hon. Gentleman is making a powerful speech. He referred to the speech on factionalism made by his colleague on the Labour Benches, the hon. Member for Leeds East (Richard Burgon), and made the point that we need an independent inquiry. One of the reasons for that is the …..."
Graham Stuart - View Speech

View all Graham Stuart (Con - Beverley and Holderness) contributions to the debate on: Lord Mandelson

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 04 Feb 2026
Lord Mandelson

"My hon. Friend is making a powerful speech, grounded as it is in the Nolan principles. Does he agree that if the Prime Minister had appointed someone who went on to breach all the Nolan principles to a position as serious as that of ambassador to the United States, that …..."
Graham Stuart - View Speech

View all Graham Stuart (Con - Beverley and Holderness) contributions to the debate on: Lord Mandelson

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 04 Feb 2026
Lord Mandelson

"Does my hon. Friend agree that the Minister needs to tell us at the Dispatch Box whether the New Statesman report today is true—that the Prime Minister was directly told that Mandelson stayed in Epstein’s flat while he was in prison, and therefore that the extent of that relationship was …..."
Graham Stuart - View Speech

View all Graham Stuart (Con - Beverley and Holderness) contributions to the debate on: Lord Mandelson

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 04 Feb 2026
Lord Mandelson

"Does my hon. Friend agree that the Minister should find out—if he does not already know—whether Mandelson was in No. 10 at the time of the last Government reshuffle? Was he involved in the appointment of Ministers on the Treasury Bench? If the Minister can tell us categorically that he …..."
Graham Stuart - View Speech

View all Graham Stuart (Con - Beverley and Holderness) contributions to the debate on: Lord Mandelson

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 04 Feb 2026
Lord Mandelson

"My hon. Friend may have heard the powerful speech by the hon. Member for Leeds East (Richard Burgon) earlier in the day about factionalism in the Labour party. The Prime Minister not only appointed Peter Mandelson to the post of ambassador knowing, as he declared today, what he knew, but …..."
Graham Stuart - View Speech

View all Graham Stuart (Con - Beverley and Holderness) contributions to the debate on: Lord Mandelson

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 04 Feb 2026
Lord Mandelson

"My hon. Friend is right to look at the process, but I do not think that it provides any cover for the Prime Minister’s decision. If the story in the New Statesman today is true, the Prime Minister was directly sent a report that

“clearly stated that Mandelson’s relationship with …..."

Graham Stuart - View Speech

View all Graham Stuart (Con - Beverley and Holderness) contributions to the debate on: Lord Mandelson

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 04 Feb 2026
Lord Mandelson

"The Government tried to stop the full disclosure of documents today. It was primarily Government Members who identified that and said that they would not put up with it, so it is thanks to them that a manuscript amendment has been tabled. However, there may still be a misunderstanding. The …..."
Graham Stuart - View Speech

View all Graham Stuart (Con - Beverley and Holderness) contributions to the debate on: Lord Mandelson

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 04 Feb 2026
Lord Mandelson

"Will my hon. Friend give way?..."
Graham Stuart - View Speech

View all Graham Stuart (Con - Beverley and Holderness) contributions to the debate on: Lord Mandelson

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 04 Feb 2026
Lord Mandelson

"Before the appointment of Peter Mandelson as our ambassador, he was appointed as a strategic adviser, a consultant, an advocate and a planner for the 2024 Labour party general election campaign. May I suggest that he was appointed—Government Members know this to be true—because he was treacherous, deceitful, a liar …..."
Graham Stuart - View Speech

View all Graham Stuart (Con - Beverley and Holderness) contributions to the debate on: Lord Mandelson