Division Vote (Commons)
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change -
View Vote Context
Graham Stuart (Con) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
85 Conservative No votes vs
0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 94
Division Vote (Commons)
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change -
View Vote Context
Graham Stuart (Con) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
84 Conservative No votes vs
0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 93
Division Vote (Commons)
24 Jun 2026 - Deferred Division -
View Vote Context
Graham Stuart (Con) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
92 Conservative No votes vs
0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 160
Division Vote (Commons)
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change -
View Vote Context
Graham Stuart (Con) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
85 Conservative No votes vs
0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 94
Division Vote (Commons)
24 Jun 2026 - Customs -
View Vote Context
Graham Stuart (Con) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
92 Conservative No votes vs
0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 160
Division Vote (Commons)
23 Jun 2026 - Defence Spending and Readiness -
View Vote Context
Graham Stuart (Con) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
98 Conservative No votes vs
0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 110
Division Vote (Commons)
23 Jun 2026 - Defence Spending and Readiness -
View Vote Context
Graham Stuart (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
96 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 307
Division Vote (Commons)
23 Jun 2026 - Puberty Blockers -
View Vote Context
Graham Stuart (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
98 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 112 Noes - 283
Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 22 Jun 2026
Oral Answers to Questions
"I recently met Alex Miles, managing director of Yorkshire Learning Providers, and heard a worrying tale that differs greatly from what the Minister has told the House today. I heard that established apprenticeship standards are being defunded and that new product foundation apprenticeships that no employer in Yorkshire has asked …..."Graham Stuart - View Speech
View all Graham Stuart (Con - Beverley and Holderness) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions
Written Question
Wednesday 17th June 2026
Asked by:
Graham Stuart (Conservative - Beverley and Holderness)
Question
to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero:
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of delays to the renewed Hydrogen Strategy on the UK hydrogen technology supply chain.
Answered by Michael Shanks
- Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)
We understand the importance of providing clarity to businesses across the hydrogen sector, including those in the supply chain. Hydrogen is backed in the Industrial Strategy Clean Energy Industries Sector Plan as a frontier technology, with a public finance offer designed to crowd private investment into UK supply chains.
We plan to publish the Hydrogen Strategy, alongside a package of other hydrogen policy documents, as soon as possible this year. The renewed strategy will set out Government’s vision and objectives for hydrogen, and how we intend to work with industry to continue to transform ambition into action.
In the meantime, we remain focused on delivery, with projects that were successful in HAR1 now moving to the final investment decision and our recent investment in UK electrolyser manufacturing with ITM Power in South Yorkshire.