To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 09 Sep 2014
Oral Answers to Questions

"6. What estimate he has made of the number of offenders given a non-custodial sentence in the past three years who had more than 100 previous convictions...."
Graham P Jones - View Speech

View all Graham P Jones (Lab - Hyndburn) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 09 Sep 2014
Oral Answers to Questions

"I thank the Secretary of State for that answer, but I am sure that Members throughout the House and the public outside will be deeply concerned that in 2013 more than 1,000 people were given a non-custodial sentence despite having 100 previous convictions, while 30,000 offenders were given a non-custodial …..."
Graham P Jones - View Speech

View all Graham P Jones (Lab - Hyndburn) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Written Question
Sentencing
Thursday 10th July 2014

Asked by: Graham P Jones (Labour - Hyndburn)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people who (a) were given a non-custodial sentence and (b) were given their first custodial sentence in each year from 2004 had previously had (i) no criminal convictions, (ii) one criminal conviction, (iii) two criminal convictions, (iv) three criminal convictions, (v) four criminal convictions, (vi) five to 10 criminal convictions, (vii) 11 to 20 criminal convictions, (viii) 21 to 30 criminal convictions, (ix) 31 to 40 criminal convictions, (x) 41 to 50 criminal convictions, (xi) 51 to 75, (xii) 76 to 100 criminal convictions and (xiii) more than 100 criminal convictions.

Answered by Jeremy Wright

Since 2010, crime has continued to fall and fewer individuals are entering the criminal justice system for the first time. But we have a persistent hardcore of offenders being recycled round and round the criminal justice system, as these figures bear out.

This Government is committed to tackling re-offending rates. We have reformed sentences, so that they combine both punishment and requirements that are effective at preventing further offending. We have legislated so that all community orders must now have a punitive element, and, from 2015, every offender leaving prison spends at least 12 months under supervision, where currently around 50,000 are released each year with no statutory support. We are transforming rehabilitation, by bringing together the best of the public, private and voluntary sectors, and only rewarding them when they actually do reduce reoffending.

Sentencing in individual cases is a matter for our independent judiciary, taking account of the circumstances of the case and the maximum penalty for the offence. A court may only impose a community order or a custodial sentence where the offence is imprisonable. The overwhelming majority of repeat offenders have previously received a number of custodial sentences but the large majority of previous convictions identified in the table below resulted in a fine as they were for summary non-motoring offences.

The number of offenders who were given a non-custodial sentence in each year since 2004, broken down by their number of previous convictions, is given in Table 1. It is important to note that these figures are based only on those offences recorded on the Police National Computer (PNC) by an English or Welsh police force, including the British Transport Police, and include a number of offences for which the maximum sentence available to the court is a fine. It should also be noted that these figures are based on counting the number of separate occasions on which offenders were sentenced in each year and some offenders will therefore be represented several times in the figures.

Table 2 provides a similar breakdown for those offenders who received their first custodial sentence in each year. Again, the figures are drawn from the PNC and will include a number of offences for which the maximum sentence available to the court is a fine. A large proportion of each offender's criminal history is therefore likely to include some offences for which it is not possible to receive a custodial sentence. Of those offenders who had between 76 and 100 previous convictions between the 12 months ending September 2004 and the 12 months ending September 2013, 84% of the disposals for their previous convictions were fines. This increases to 96% when you look at the offenders who had over 100 previous convictions. It should also be noted that these figures are based on counting the number of separate occasions on which offenders were sentenced in each year and some offenders could therefore be represented several times in the figures.

The number of offenders who have received at least one previous conviction, or indeed multiple previous convictions, before receiving their first custodial sentence has decreased under this Government.


Written Question

Question Link

Wednesday 14th May 2014

Asked by: Graham P Jones (Labour - Hyndburn)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people who (a) were given a non-custodial sentence and (b) were given their first custodial sentence in each year from 2004 had previously had (i) no criminal convictions, (ii) one criminal conviction, (iii) two criminal convictions, (iv) three criminal convictions, (v) four criminal convictions, (vi) five to 10 criminal convictions, (vii) 11 to 20 criminal convictions, (viii) 21 to 30 criminal convictions, (ix) 31 to 40 criminal convictions, (x) 41 to 50 criminal convictions, (xi) 51 to 75 criminal convictions, (xii) 76 to 100 criminal convictions and (xiii) more than 100 criminal convictions.

Answered by Jeremy Wright

It has not been possible to obtain this information. I will write to the Honourable member in due course.


Written Question

Question Link

Wednesday 14th May 2014

Asked by: Graham P Jones (Labour - Hyndburn)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when he plans to Answer question number 191341, submitted by the hon. Member for Hyndburn on 10 March 2014 for Answer on 13 March 2014.

Answered by Jeremy Wright

It has not been possible to obtain the information required to respond to question 191341 from the hon Member forHyndburn. I will write to the hon Member shortly. I apologise for the delay in responding to these questions.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 05 Feb 2013
Oral Answers to Questions

"Does the Minister accept that that puts pressure on jury service? A constituent of mine—an elderly 69-year-old lady who is not ill but slightly infirm—has been asked to do her third stint of jury service, and she has to take three buses to get to court. Is there anything the …..."
Graham P Jones - View Speech

View all Graham P Jones (Lab - Hyndburn) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Fri 30 Nov 2012
Prisons (Property) Bill

"The hon. Gentleman suggests that the phones should be destroyed. Does he think that they should be interrogated before they are destroyed, and is that addressed in his Bill?..."
Graham P Jones - View Speech

View all Graham P Jones (Lab - Hyndburn) contributions to the debate on: Prisons (Property) Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Fri 30 Nov 2012
Prisons (Property) Bill

"Will that action be retrospective on the 40,000 phones that are currently held or will it apply only to those that are confiscated once the Bill is passed?..."
Graham P Jones - View Speech

View all Graham P Jones (Lab - Hyndburn) contributions to the debate on: Prisons (Property) Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 29 Mar 2011
Oral Answers to Questions

"5. What level of resources his Department plans to provide to the Prison Service in 2011-12; and if he will make a statement...."
Graham P Jones - View Speech

View all Graham P Jones (Lab - Hyndburn) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 29 Mar 2011
Oral Answers to Questions

"If, as the Secretary of State predicted in The Daily Telegraph on 11 February, crime increases under his Government, will he reverse his prison closure policy and undo the scaling back of the prison building programme? If not, what will he do with the criminals?..."
Graham P Jones - View Speech

View all Graham P Jones (Lab - Hyndburn) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions