All 3 Debates between Graeme Morrice and Michael Fallon

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Graeme Morrice and Michael Fallon
Monday 12th January 2015

(9 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Graeme Morrice Portrait Graeme Morrice (Livingston) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

5. What plans he has to consider delivery of UK defence capability through conventional rather than nuclear weapons as part of the 2015 strategic defence and security review.

Michael Fallon Portrait The Secretary of State for Defence (Michael Fallon)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The next strategic defence and security review is a matter for after the general election. My Department is preparing for the review, but our focus remains the delivery of the 2010 review.

Graeme Morrice Portrait Graeme Morrice
- Hansard - -

In a period of changing security threat, and as the national security strategy noted in 2010, is it not sensible to consider how ending the Trident replacement programme would release resources that could be spent more effectively on other security measures, as well as on a range of other public spending priorities, not least our national health service?

Michael Fallon Portrait Michael Fallon
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Successive Governments, Labour and Conservative, have been committed to our continuous at-sea deterrent for more than 45 years, and I hope that the Labour party in Scotland will not waiver from that. It would be extremely dangerous to move to any kind of part-time or lesser deterrent, and the Conservative party will not gamble with Britain’s national security.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Graeme Morrice and Michael Fallon
Thursday 5th December 2013

(10 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Michael Fallon Portrait Michael Fallon
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The EU business taskforce, which I chair, identified 30 regulations that should be repealed. We continue to press the Commission to lighten the rules for small businesses and to exempt the very smallest businesses altogether.

Graeme Morrice Portrait Graeme Morrice (Livingston) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

6. What recent estimate he has made of the number of apprentices being paid below the apprenticeship minimum wage.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Graeme Morrice and Michael Fallon
Thursday 18th July 2013

(10 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Chris Williamson Portrait Chris Williamson (Derby North) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

12. What steps he is taking to protect the universal service obligation under plans for the privatisation of Royal Mail.

Michael Fallon Portrait The Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (Michael Fallon)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government’s overarching objective is to secure the future of the universal postal service. The minimum requirements of the universal service are enshrined in primary legislation, which means that the six-days-a-week, one-price-goes-anywhere service to every address in the United Kingdom can only be amended by Parliament. That protection will continue to apply following any sale of shares in Royal Mail.

Graeme Morrice Portrait Graeme Morrice
- Hansard - -

The Government’s Royal Mail privatisation has been opposed by a broad coalition, including employees of Royal Mail, the Countryside Alliance, the National Federation of SubPostmasters, and even the Conservative think-tank the Bow Group. Moreover, the results of a recent poll showed that the vast majority of the British public oppose it as well. Is it not time that the Secretary of State abandoned his plans for the fire sale of Royal Mail in the face of that overwhelming opposition?

Michael Fallon Portrait Michael Fallon
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Last week’s announcement confirmed our plans to allow this very successful British business access to private capital for the first time, and to deliver what Parliament agreed more than two years ago, namely that 10% of the company should be in the hands of the work force.