Leveson Inquiry Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Gerry Sutcliffe

Main Page: Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour - Bradford South)

Leveson Inquiry

Gerry Sutcliffe Excerpts
Wednesday 25th April 2012

(12 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Jeremy Hunt Portrait Mr Hunt
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Absolutely. The most important thing was that when James Murdoch offered undertakings in lieu of a referral to the Competition Commission, which it is his right to do so and my duty to consider, instead of accepting those undertakings, which I was legally completely entitled to do, I said that I would not do so until I had been given proper advice by Ofcom and the OFT as to whether it would be appropriate to do so. When I got that advice, I considered it carefully and I followed it. That is not required by the law, but I chose to do that because of my commitment to the integrity of the process.

Gerry Sutcliffe Portrait Mr Gerry Sutcliffe (Bradford South) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Why was the special adviser the nominated person in the Department? If this was so important, as the Secretary of State is saying, why was his special adviser the nominated person?

Jeremy Hunt Portrait Mr Hunt
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

His role was agreed by the permanent secretary, but he was not the only person; we had contacts on all sorts of levels—[Interruption.] Let me explain this to the House. When complex undertakings are involved in a huge merger, the process is very complex and there are, inevitably, a range of contacts. As I say, I have tried to be as transparent as possible in all those contacts. I think that, in this particular case, the contacts overstepped the mark, which is why, regrettably, Adam Smith has decided to resign. But let me point out to the hon. Gentleman that Adam Smith, in his statement, said:

“While it was part of my role to keep News Corporation informed throughout the BSkyB bid process, the content and extent of my contact was done without authorisation from the Secretary of State.”