All 1 Debates between Gerald Kaufman and Paul Farrelly

Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill

Debate between Gerald Kaufman and Paul Farrelly
Wednesday 16th February 2011

(13 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Gerald Kaufman Portrait Sir Gerald Kaufman
- Hansard - -

I will give way in a moment, but I want to proceed on this point.

When I was shadow Home Secretary, I negotiated with the then Conservative Home Secretary, Leon Brittan, about a Representation of the People Bill—that is what Bills dealing with the political system and elections in this country used to be called— which he was introducing. The dog’s breakfast that is before us this evening is a misrepresentation of the people Bill, based on an obligation to placate the self-interest of the third party in the House. There is no doubt whatever about that.

--- Later in debate ---
Gerald Kaufman Portrait Sir Gerald Kaufman
- Hansard - -

I understand the hon. Gentleman’s point, but I do not necessarily agree with him.

Paul Farrelly Portrait Paul Farrelly
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Member for Stone (Mr Cash) quoted not the Member for Deauville, or even Trouville, but the right hon. Member for Yeovil (Mr Laws). Does my right hon. Friend recognise that those of us who are more sympathetic to AV have legitimate concerns about its operation in practice because of the behaviour of the Liberal Democrats since the general election. They talk of five more years of the coalition, but we cannot be sure that they will not direct their supporters to use their second preference against the Labour party, for instance. In those circumstances, is it not reasonable to have a threshold, so that we can be certain that the British people have expressed a clear opinion?

Gerald Kaufman Portrait Sir Gerald Kaufman
- Hansard - -

We do not know what the turnout will be on 5 May. What we do know, in my constituency, is that we will murder the Liberal Democrats in the local elections, whatever the threshold. My hon. Friend’s point is relevant, because the issue is not whether one is for or against AV. The debate is not about that; it is about whether we seek to appease a small minority of the House of Commons by rigging our precious electoral system, which has served us well.