Points of Order Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Defence

Points of Order

Gerald Howarth Excerpts
Monday 24th November 2014

(10 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will just say that the right hon. Gentleman has made his point with his usual force and eloquence, and it is on the record.

Gerald Howarth Portrait Sir Gerald Howarth (Aldershot) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The day would not be complete without a further point of order.

--- Later in debate ---
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman has never sought any particular acknowledgment. I do not want to embarrass him, because this is something of a tribute to him, but he is the only Member of the House I have ever come across who has phoned the organisers of a parliamentary awards competition to protest at his inclusion on the shortlist and to demand his removal. He certainly cannot be accused of seeking prizes or special recognition, and I respect that.

Gerald Howarth Portrait Sir Gerald Howarth
- Hansard - -

Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker. While the traditional practice of referring to those who have served as gallant Members may have fallen into desuetude, surely at this present time—when the nation has been committed to military options, and there is seriously enhanced concern for the well-being of members of our armed forces—there is a purpose in maintaining the tradition. It indicates that many right hon. and hon. Members across the House—I see that the hon. Member for Barnsley Central (Dan Jarvis), in particular, is in his place—have served themselves, which sends out a message to the nation. I am a traditionalist, but surely tradition serves the House and the nation in this case.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Members may agree with the hon. Gentleman, which is why they deploy the term. I certainly could not disagree with the latter part of the point of order. Indeed, the word “traditional” could have been invented to describe him, and he is none the worse for that. I thank him for what he has said.