UK's Nuclear Deterrent Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

UK's Nuclear Deterrent

George Kerevan Excerpts
Monday 18th July 2016

(8 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness May of Maidenhead Portrait The Prime Minister
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The answer to that is yes—we are very clear that we face different threats and need different capabilities to face them. We have now committed to 2% of GDP being spent on defence, and we have increased the defence budget and the money that we spend on more conventional forces.

George Kerevan Portrait George Kerevan (East Lothian) (SNP)
- Hansard - -

I congratulate the Prime Minister on her new role, but let us cut to the chase: is she personally prepared to authorise a nuclear strike that could kill 100,000 innocent men, women and children?

Baroness May of Maidenhead Portrait The Prime Minister
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes. The whole point of a deterrent is that our enemies need to know that we would be prepared to use it, unlike the suggestion that we could have a nuclear deterrent but not actually be willing to use it, which seemed to come from the Labour Front Bench.