Geoffrey Cox Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Geoffrey Cox

Information between 22nd March 2025 - 21st April 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 104
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 167
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 167
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 101 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 311 Noes - 192
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 101 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 190
25 Mar 2025 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 198
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 180
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 101 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 166
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 179
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 102 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 180
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 101 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 196
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 102 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 117
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 104 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 183
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 101 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 313 Noes - 194
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 101 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 110 Noes - 302
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Geoffrey Cox voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 98 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 110


Written Answers
Post Boxes: Housing Estates
Asked by: Geoffrey Cox (Conservative - Torridge and Tavistock)
Wednesday 26th March 2025

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether his Department has considered providing access to post boxes in new housing developments.

Answered by Justin Madders - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade)

The government is not responsible for providing access to post boxes.

Section 29(6) of the Postal Services Act 2011 requires Ofcom, as the independent regulator, to secure the provision of sufficient access points.

Royal Mail is currently required by Ofcom’s Designated Universal Service Provider (DUSP) condition 1.8.1 to provide a post box within half a mile, by straight line distance, of the premises of at least 98% of users of postal services.