Debates between Gareth Thomas and Lindsay Hoyle during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Wed 14th Nov 2018
Tue 27th Feb 2018
Department for Transport
Commons Chamber

1st reading: House of Commons

Police Employer Pension Contributions

Debate between Gareth Thomas and Lindsay Hoyle
Wednesday 14th November 2018

(6 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Gareth Thomas Portrait Gareth Thomas
- Hansard - -

rose—

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We started off with the midlands; let’s go with the midlands again and then we will come back to London. I call Jack Dromey.

--- Later in debate ---
Gareth Thomas Portrait Gareth Thomas
- Hansard - -

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. I would not normally intervene on a speech by a Minister replying to a debate, but I am seeing on social media that, despite the Minister saying there will be no statement about the Cabinet’s discussions on Brexit, there is now due to be a statement by the Prime Minister to the press afterwards. I wonder if there is any way in which we can clarify the situation.

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Sir Lindsay Hoyle)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is not a matter for me, as the hon. Gentleman well knows. I am sure if somebody wishes to come forward, they can do so, but the Minister did give a very honest, open statement. I have no more to add other than what has been said. I suggest that the Minister continues with the debate unless he has an answer to the question.

Department for Transport

Debate between Gareth Thomas and Lindsay Hoyle
Gareth Thomas Portrait Gareth Thomas
- Hansard - -

Does my hon. Friend also think it is regrettable that the Department for Transport has blocked London from accessing the new national clean air fund, given the scale of problems that diesel is causing, particularly in central and outer London?

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Sir Lindsay Hoyle)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. I do not want to stop the debate, but I am going to have to drop the time limit to four minutes for the next speaker. The way we are going, it will have to go down to three to get everyone in. I am bothered about that, so can Members who have already spoken bear that in mind?