Tuition Fees Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Tuition Fees

Frank Dobson Excerpts
Tuesday 30th November 2010

(13 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Frank Dobson Portrait Frank Dobson (Holborn and St Pancras) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Vince Cable Portrait Vince Cable
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will take the intervention when I have finished the point. I am interested in the right hon. Gentleman’s views.

The second point that Browne adopted at our request in order to make the system more progressive was significantly to raise the threshold. The right hon. Member for Southampton, Itchen asked legitimate questions about the pricing of the threshold and what that means in real terms. Those are valid points, but he did not point out that when the Labour Government introduced their threshold they did not increase it at all. So we are making a perfectly valid comparison between £21,000 and £15,000, whether those are in today’s prices or 2015-16 prices. It is a significantly better system in which large numbers—roughly 25%—of low-paid graduates will be better off under our proposals than under the system that we inherited from the Labour party.

Frank Dobson Portrait Frank Dobson
- Hansard - -

I have the honour to represent Birkbeck college. Has the right hon. Gentleman just said that people who already have a degree and go to Birkbeck for another one will not get any help?

Vince Cable Portrait Vince Cable
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The arrangements for second degrees under the existing regime are quite different, as the right hon. Gentleman knows, from the arrangements for first degrees. The proposal is that we treat first degree part-time students considerably more favourably than they are treated under the existing arrangements. If he checks back with Birkbeck college and with the Open university, he will note that those universities regard our proposals as a significantly better arrangement than the one they currently have.