To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Prescription Drugs: Misuse
Wednesday 11th March 2015

Asked by: Eric Ollerenshaw (Conservative - Lancaster and Fleetwood)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will make it his policy that it be mandatory for clinical commissioning groups to commission services to support patients withdrawing from prescribed medicines; and what criteria are used for deciding whether services should be mandatory.

Answered by Jane Ellison

The public health responsibilities which were transferred to local authorities by the Health and Social Care Act 2012 include the commissioning of specialist treatment for people who are dependent on drugs including prescribed medicines. The responsibility of clinical commissioning groups in this area is medicines management, which includes ensuring good prescribing practice, ensuring that prescribers are supported to manage withdrawal in non-complex cases and facilitating referral to specialist help where appropriate.

Public Health England (PHE) is supporting several local authorities that have expressed an interest in developing their support for people affected by addictions to medicines. This pathfinder work is locally designed and led.

PHE is assisting each area to develop their work plans, establish management, monitoring and oversight as well as working with them to ensure that appropriate clinical governance is in place. It will subsequently work with them to support delivery and monitor outcomes.

Information is not held centrally on the number of people prescribed particular medicines or the duration of treatment.


Division Vote (Commons)
9 Mar 2015 - Consumer Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Eric Ollerenshaw (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 227 Conservative Aye votes vs 4 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 353 Noes - 5
MP Expense Claim
Eric Ollerenshaw (Conservative - Lancaster and Fleetwood)
Date
Wed 4th Mar 2015
428250
Type
Staff Travel
(Own Vehicle Car MP Staff)
Description
Within Constituency Travel
Distance: 32 miles
Amount
£8.10
Paid

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 03 Mar 2015
Maternity Services (Morecambe Bay)

Speech Link

View all Eric Ollerenshaw (Con - Lancaster and Fleetwood) contributions to the debate on: Maternity Services (Morecambe Bay)

Division Vote (Commons)
25 Feb 2015 - Members’ Paid Directorships and Consultancies - View Vote Context
Eric Ollerenshaw (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 248 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 287
Division Vote (Commons)
25 Feb 2015 - Bankers’ Bonuses and the Banking Industry - View Vote Context
Eric Ollerenshaw (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 264 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 234 Noes - 308
Written Question
Cancer: Drugs
Wednesday 25th February 2015

Asked by: Eric Ollerenshaw (Conservative - Lancaster and Fleetwood)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, when he expects NHS England to publish the third quarter figures for Cancer Drugs Fund notifications and individual Cancer Drugs Fund requests for 2014-15; and if he will make a statement.

Answered by George Freeman

NHS England has advised that it expects to publish the third quarter figures for Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF) notifications and individual CDF requests for 2014-15 on its website at: www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/pe/cdf/ by the end of February 2015.

Since October 2010, over 60,000 patients in England have benefitted from the CDF.


Division Vote (Commons)
23 Feb 2015 - Serious Crime Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Eric Ollerenshaw (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 151 Conservative Aye votes vs 78 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 292
Division Vote (Commons)
23 Feb 2015 - Serious Crime Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Eric Ollerenshaw (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 237 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 491 Noes - 2
Division Vote (Commons)
23 Feb 2015 - Serious Crime Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Eric Ollerenshaw (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 253 Conservative No votes vs 8 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 233 Noes - 296