To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
26 Mar 2015 - Elections for Positions in the House - View Vote Context
Eric Ollerenshaw (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 198 Conservative Aye votes vs 23 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 228
Division Vote (Commons)
25 Mar 2015 - Infrastructure Planning - View Vote Context
Eric Ollerenshaw (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 240 Conservative Aye votes vs 5 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 33
Division Vote (Commons)
25 Mar 2015 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Eric Ollerenshaw (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 267 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 305
Division Vote (Commons)
25 Mar 2015 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Eric Ollerenshaw (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 267 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 229 Noes - 306
Division Vote (Commons)
25 Mar 2015 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Eric Ollerenshaw (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 270 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 230 Noes - 309
Division Vote (Commons)
25 Mar 2015 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Eric Ollerenshaw (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 270 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 226
Division Vote (Commons)
24 Mar 2015 - Section 5 of the European Communities (Amendment) Act 1993 - View Vote Context
Eric Ollerenshaw (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 258 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 199
Written Question
Drugs: Poisoning
Tuesday 24th March 2015

Asked by: Eric Ollerenshaw (Conservative - Lancaster and Fleetwood)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many (a) men, (b) women and (c) children were admitted to hospital for drug poisoning, showing ICD10 codes T36-T50 separately, at a four character level in 2014.

Answered by Jane Ellison

The information requested is attached. It provides a count of the number of finished admission episodes with a primary diagnosis of T36-T50 for male and female adults and children for the year 2013-14. Explanatory footnotes have also been provided.

It should be noted that this is not a count of patients as the same patient may have been admitted more than once in a year.


Written Question
Tranquillisers
Tuesday 24th March 2015

Asked by: Eric Ollerenshaw (Conservative - Lancaster and Fleetwood)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, whether the General Practice Research Database includes data on the prescribing of tranquillisers; and if he will use this database to calculate the number of patients with a long-term dependency on tranquillisers.

Answered by George Freeman

The CPRD GOLD primary care database (former GPRD) includes information about all prescriptions issued in primary care for a subset of approximately 8% of the United Kingdom population. This database has previously been used to study prescribing of anxiolytic, hypnotic and psychotropic medication, commonly referred to as tranquilisers.

It would be possible to use the database to estimate the number of patients in the UK with a long-term dependency on prescription tranquilisers. However, as dependence will not be systematically identified by general practitioners, expert clinician advice would also be required to develop a definition. This could be based on frequency of prescribing and medication strength but could also include clinical codes for medical conditions including indications for these products, drug dependency and substance abuse, if recorded.

This work would represent a research project and as such, a scientific protocol would need to be submitted to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency’s Independent Scientific Advisory Committee for assessment and possible approval.

Even with such an approach, the rate of drug dependency in the population could only be estimated, and in order to assess whether this estimate was a true representation of the actual rate of drug dependency in this population, a validation study would be encouraged.

The Department is looking into the feasibility of commissioning further research on patterns of long-term prescription of dependency-forming medicines, including analyses of relevant prescribing data.


Written Question
GlaxoSmithKline
Tuesday 24th March 2015

Asked by: Eric Ollerenshaw (Conservative - Lancaster and Fleetwood)

Question to the Attorney General:

To ask the Attorney General, whether there is a point of contact for members of the public who wish to help the Serious Fraud Office investigation into GlaxoSmithKline.

Answered by Robert Buckland

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has a secure reporting mechanism, SFO Confidential, which can be accessed through its website.