All 3 Debates between Emma Reynolds and Baroness Featherstone

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Emma Reynolds and Baroness Featherstone
Monday 7th March 2011

(13 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Emma Reynolds Portrait Emma Reynolds (Wolverhampton North East) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

21. When she plans to announce the outcome of her review of human trafficking policy.

Baroness Featherstone Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department (Lynne Featherstone)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I refer the hon. Lady to the answer I gave some moments ago.

Emma Reynolds Portrait Emma Reynolds
- Hansard - -

In September, in defending the Government’s failure to opt into the European Union directive, the Prime Minister said:

“We have put everything that is in the directive in place.”—[Official Report, 15 September 2010; Vol. 515, c. 873.]

At the same time, he implied that the directive is not in our national interest. Is it not the case that it is both squarely in our national interest and goes beyond the measures that we already have in place? Will she therefore take the opportunity of the 100th anniversary of international women’s day to commit to this House that the Government will sign up to the European directive when they get the opportunity?

Baroness Featherstone Portrait Lynne Featherstone
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the hon. Lady, but not for the first time I repeat that we are looking at the directive’s text and considering its merits. If we conclude that opting into the directive will benefit the UK, we will consider doing so.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Emma Reynolds and Baroness Featherstone
Thursday 2nd December 2010

(14 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Featherstone Portrait Lynne Featherstone
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is entirely right. Diverse organisations that reflect their customers offer better products and services as a result. In addition to appointing Lord Davies and implementing positive action, we are working with partners to encourage greater gender pay transparency. As I announced this morning, we will work with business to arrange for companies of 150 staff—not 250, as under the previous Government—to publish information that will allow people to understand their progression in the workplace.

Emma Reynolds Portrait Emma Reynolds (Wolverhampton North East) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I welcome the Government’s strategy to increase the number of women on the boards of companies. Will the Minister seriously consider international best practice, such as that of Norway, and introduce a quota?

Baroness Featherstone Portrait Lynne Featherstone
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government have no intention of introducing legislation permitting quotas, but we will listen to what Lord Davies says when he comes back with his recommendations and respond then.

Socio-economic Equality Duty

Debate between Emma Reynolds and Baroness Featherstone
Thursday 18th November 2010

(14 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Emma Reynolds Portrait Emma Reynolds (Wolverhampton North East) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

The Government’s dilution of the previous Government’s equality legislation is just one of a series of betrayals of women. They failed to undertake a gender impact assessment of the emergency Budget—[Interruption.] Maybe the Minister for Policing and Criminal Justice would like to take this seriously, because it is a serious matter. The Government have failed to sign up to new measures to combat human trafficking of women and children, and they have frozen the pay of the lowest-paid public sector workers, whose actual salaries are less than £21,000 and many of whom are women. When exactly will they stop taking measures that have a disproportionately negative impact on women?

Baroness Featherstone Portrait Lynne Featherstone
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As I am sure the hon. Lady knows, the Treasury did an envelope impact assessment on the comprehensive spending review, and each Department will undertake an extensive impact assessment as the spending review plays out. The Government are absolutely committed to equality and fairness—not just saying that we are doing it, but actually doing it.