Information between 27th April 2026 - 27th May 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
27 Apr 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over) - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 269 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 176 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 268 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 171 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 170 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 265 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 170 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 268 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 167 |
|
27 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 64 |
|
28 Apr 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 6 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 28 |
|
28 Apr 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 308 Noes - 81 |
|
28 Apr 2026 - Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 15 Labour Aye votes vs 333 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 223 Noes - 335 |
|
20 May 2026 - Defence Readiness - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 317 |
|
20 May 2026 - Defence Readiness - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 171 |
|
20 May 2026 - Defence Readiness - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 316 |
|
20 May 2026 - Defence Readiness - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 408 |
|
19 May 2026 - Energy Security - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 323 |
|
21 May 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Emma Lewell voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 231 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 242 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Emma Lewell speeches from: Business of the House
Emma Lewell contributed 1 speech (92 words) Thursday 21st May 2026 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
|
Emma Lewell speeches from: Middle East: Economic Response
Emma Lewell contributed 1 speech (86 words) Thursday 21st May 2026 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
|
Emma Lewell speeches from: Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges
Emma Lewell contributed 1 speech (583 words) Tuesday 28th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
| Written Answers | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme
Asked by: Emma Lewell (Labour - South Shields) Tuesday 28th April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he has made an assessment of the potential merits of a Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme replacement. Answered by Sharon Hodgson - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Our deepest sympathies are with those who have experienced harm following vaccination, as well as their families. The Government recognises that concerns have been raised in relation to the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS), including during Module 4 of the COVID-19 inquiry. Following the publication of the COVID-19 Inquiry’s Module 4 report on vaccines and therapeutics on 16 April 2026, the Government will carefully consider its recommendations, including on the reform of the VDPS, and will respond formally in due course. |
||||||||||
|
Healthy Start Scheme
Asked by: Emma Lewell (Labour - South Shields) Tuesday 28th April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, when the NHS Business Services Authority will begin writing proactively to eligible families about their NHS Healthy Start entitlement, encouraging them to apply and offering them support with the application process. Answered by Sharon Hodgson - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department continues to work with the NHS Business Services Authority on ways to encourage those eligible to apply for the Healthy Start Scheme to apply. The Department keeps the eligibility criteria for the Healthy Start Scheme under continuous review. There are no current plans to change the eligibility for the scheme. |
||||||||||
|
Healthy Start Scheme
Asked by: Emma Lewell (Labour - South Shields) Tuesday 28th April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of revising the eligibility criteria for NHS Healthy Start cards. Answered by Sharon Hodgson - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department continues to work with the NHS Business Services Authority on ways to encourage those eligible to apply for the Healthy Start Scheme to apply. The Department keeps the eligibility criteria for the Healthy Start Scheme under continuous review. There are no current plans to change the eligibility for the scheme. |
||||||||||
|
Local Housing Allowance
Asked by: Emma Lewell (Labour - South Shields) Tuesday 28th April 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what recent assessment she has made of the adequacy of the Local Housing Allowance in helping low-income tenants meet their housing costs. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions reviewed Local Housing Allowance rates and confirmed in his written statement on 26 November 2025 (HCWS1101) that rates would be maintained at their current levels for 2026/27.
Renters facing a shortfall in meeting their housing costs can apply for discretionary support through the Crisis and Resilience Fund (CRF) Housing Payments from local authorities in England. In Wales and Scotland Discretionary Housing Payments apply. |
||||||||||
|
Holiday Activities and Food Programme
Asked by: Emma Lewell (Labour - South Shields) Tuesday 28th April 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent assessment she has made of the potential merits of local authorities piloting community eligibility, or open access, for the Holiday Activities and Food programme in more deprived areas. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) The holiday activities and food (HAF) programme provides free nutritious meals, enriching activities, and safe environments to children and young people from low-income families during the school holidays, benefiting their health, wellbeing and readiness to learn. Local authorities and their providers have flexibility in how they deliver provision to best serve the needs of young people in their area. The department’s published HAF guidance encourages all local authorities to have a varied mix of provision that caters for different ages and interests, including through collaboration with relevant local organisations. We are aware that several local authorities are utilising different delivery models for HAF to better suit the needs and interests of teenagers, including the HAF Plus model, which features an App There have been several successful pilots within the HAF programme in collaboration with participating local authorities to further test what works in practice and develop innovative approaches to supporting children and young people We will continue to consider potential future pilots. |
||||||||||
|
Holiday Activities and Food Programme
Asked by: Emma Lewell (Labour - South Shields) Tuesday 28th April 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether local authorities in England have received from the Department for Education information on how they can implement the HAF Plus model of the Holiday Activities and Food programme. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) The holiday activities and food (HAF) programme provides free nutritious meals, enriching activities, and safe environments to children and young people from low-income families during the school holidays, benefiting their health, wellbeing and readiness to learn. Local authorities and their providers have flexibility in how they deliver provision to best serve the needs of young people in their area. The department’s published HAF guidance encourages all local authorities to have a varied mix of provision that caters for different ages and interests, including through collaboration with relevant local organisations. We are aware that several local authorities are utilising different delivery models for HAF to better suit the needs and interests of teenagers, including the HAF Plus model, which features an App There have been several successful pilots within the HAF programme in collaboration with participating local authorities to further test what works in practice and develop innovative approaches to supporting children and young people We will continue to consider potential future pilots. |
||||||||||
|
Army: Recruitment
Asked by: Emma Lewell (Labour - South Shields) Monday 18th May 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether under-18-year-old recruits in Army initial training are subject to staged exit restrictions when seeking to leave service. Answered by Louise Sandher-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) All recruits have a statutory right to discharge, known as Discharge as of Right (DAOR). If under 18 at attestation, they may terminate their service at any time after completing 28 days of full-time paid duty and before six months have elapsed from their first day of service, by giving at least 14 days’ written notice to their Commanding Officer (CO). The CO may reduce the notice period at their discretion.
After six months, under-18s can apply to leave up to their 18th birthday but must give written notice and observe a cooling-off period of up to three months, which may be shortened by agreement. They can withdraw their notice during this period.
Commanders must ensure that under-18 recruits are fully informed of their rights to discharge and must facilitate their safe return to parents, guardians, or appropriate care arrangements. Support includes travel arrangements, accommodation if necessary, reimbursement of reasonable expenses, and follow-up to confirm safe arrival. This process safeguards both the recruit’s statutory rights and welfare.
All recruits and Junior Soldiers receive formal briefing on their right to Discharge as of Right during the Officer Commanding’s Week one induction.
In exceptional cases where family or welfare circumstances necessitate an under-18 recruit’s early release, the CO may apply to the competent Service authority to terminate the soldier’s service without requiring the usual 14 days’ notice or adherence to the six-month period. This provision allows for immediate discharge on safeguarding or welfare grounds, ensuring the recruit’s welfare is prioritised.
|
||||||||||
|
Army: Recruitment
Asked by: Emma Lewell (Labour - South Shields) Monday 18th May 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether provisions allow the immediate discharge of an under-18 year old recruit from Army training on safeguarding or welfare grounds, including where there are allegations of abuse; and whether such discharge can occur without the requirement to complete notice periods or cooling-off periods. Answered by Louise Sandher-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) All recruits have a statutory right to discharge, known as Discharge as of Right (DAOR). If under 18 at attestation, they may terminate their service at any time after completing 28 days of full-time paid duty and before six months have elapsed from their first day of service, by giving at least 14 days’ written notice to their Commanding Officer (CO). The CO may reduce the notice period at their discretion.
After six months, under-18s can apply to leave up to their 18th birthday but must give written notice and observe a cooling-off period of up to three months, which may be shortened by agreement. They can withdraw their notice during this period.
Commanders must ensure that under-18 recruits are fully informed of their rights to discharge and must facilitate their safe return to parents, guardians, or appropriate care arrangements. Support includes travel arrangements, accommodation if necessary, reimbursement of reasonable expenses, and follow-up to confirm safe arrival. This process safeguards both the recruit’s statutory rights and welfare.
All recruits and Junior Soldiers receive formal briefing on their right to Discharge as of Right during the Officer Commanding’s Week one induction.
In exceptional cases where family or welfare circumstances necessitate an under-18 recruit’s early release, the CO may apply to the competent Service authority to terminate the soldier’s service without requiring the usual 14 days’ notice or adherence to the six-month period. This provision allows for immediate discharge on safeguarding or welfare grounds, ensuring the recruit’s welfare is prioritised.
|
||||||||||
|
Army: Recruitment
Asked by: Emma Lewell (Labour - South Shields) Monday 18th May 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what information is provided to under-18-year-old recruits in Army training regarding their right to leave service, and at what point in training this information is communicated. Answered by Louise Sandher-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) All recruits have a statutory right to discharge, known as Discharge as of Right (DAOR). If under 18 at attestation, they may terminate their service at any time after completing 28 days of full-time paid duty and before six months have elapsed from their first day of service, by giving at least 14 days’ written notice to their Commanding Officer (CO). The CO may reduce the notice period at their discretion.
After six months, under-18s can apply to leave up to their 18th birthday but must give written notice and observe a cooling-off period of up to three months, which may be shortened by agreement. They can withdraw their notice during this period.
Commanders must ensure that under-18 recruits are fully informed of their rights to discharge and must facilitate their safe return to parents, guardians, or appropriate care arrangements. Support includes travel arrangements, accommodation if necessary, reimbursement of reasonable expenses, and follow-up to confirm safe arrival. This process safeguards both the recruit’s statutory rights and welfare.
All recruits and Junior Soldiers receive formal briefing on their right to Discharge as of Right during the Officer Commanding’s Week one induction.
In exceptional cases where family or welfare circumstances necessitate an under-18 recruit’s early release, the CO may apply to the competent Service authority to terminate the soldier’s service without requiring the usual 14 days’ notice or adherence to the six-month period. This provision allows for immediate discharge on safeguarding or welfare grounds, ensuring the recruit’s welfare is prioritised.
|
||||||||||
|
Army: Recruitment
Asked by: Emma Lewell (Labour - South Shields) Monday 18th May 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many under-18-year-old recruits in Army initial training have (a) requested to leave service, (b) been required to observe a cooling-off period, (c) had their discharge delayed beyond 14 days, and (d) been refused discharge, in each year since 2016. Answered by Louise Sandher-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) The Ministry of Defence holds data on the number of under-18-year-old recruits in Army initial training who have requested to leave service only from Training Year 2023-24 onwards. Data prior to this period is not available.
(a) Number of under-18 recruits who requested to leave service:
*Training Year 2026-27 is ongoing; figures are correct as of 15 May 2026.
Data on the number of recruits required to observe a “cooling-off” period is not held, nor do we hold data on the number of under-18 discharges delayed beyond 14 days. Recruits are formally interviewed to confirm their reasons for requesting discharge and may be encouraged to reflect; however, if a recruit elects to proceed with Discharge As of Right (DAOR), their statutory entitlement is enacted without delay.
There are no recorded instances of under-18 recruits being refused discharge within the DAOR window. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Tuesday 9th June Emma Lewell signed this EDM on Tuesday 9th June 2026 14 signatures (Most recent: 10 Jun 2026) Tabled by: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington) That this House welcomes the establishment of the Orgreave Inquiry into the events surrounding the policing of the miners’ strike at Orgreave on 18 June 1984; recognises the profound significance of this decision for former miners, their families and coalfield communities across the UK; notes that, more than four decades … |
|
Tuesday 9th June Emma Lewell signed this EDM on Tuesday 9th June 2026 30 signatures (Most recent: 9 Jun 2026) Tabled by: Richard Burgon (Labour - Leeds East) That this House warmly congratulates Tracy Thirlwall on her well earned retirement as Office Manager of the hon. Member for Leeds East's Constituency office after 11 successful years in that role; notes that her retirement comes after more than 4 decades of committed service for Leeds residents, firstly working in … |
|
Tuesday 2nd June Emma Lewell signed this EDM on Thursday 4th June 2026 52 signatures (Most recent: 10 Jun 2026) Tabled by: Steve Darling (Liberal Democrat - Torbay) That this House condemns the Government’s continued refusal to provide any compensation to women affected by changes to the state pension age, turning its back on millions of pension-age women who were harmed through no fault of their own; regrets Ministers’ decisions to effectively ignore the recommendations of the independent … |
|
Monday 1st June Emma Lewell signed this EDM on Thursday 4th June 2026 39 signatures (Most recent: 10 Jun 2026) Tabled by: Sorcha Eastwood (Alliance - Lagan Valley) That this House notes with alarm that the UK hospitality sector is under severe and compounding pressure, with thousands of businesses entering insolvency and margins eroded by rising energy costs, increased business rates, staff shortages, and supply chain inflation; recognises that the United Kingdom is an outlier among European countries, … |
|
Monday 18th May Emma Lewell signed this EDM on Tuesday 19th May 2026 Burnhope Miners' Gala Centenary Celebration 13 signatures (Most recent: 21 May 2026)Tabled by: Luke Akehurst (Labour - North Durham) That this House congratulates the residents of the village of Burnhope, County Durham, on the Centenary Celebration of the 1926 occasion when Burnhope hosted 40,000 people at the only Durham Miners’ Gala ever to be held outside of Durham City; commends the organisers of the 15-17 May 2026 Burnhope celebration … |
|
Wednesday 13th May Emma Lewell signed this EDM on Thursday 14th May 2026 63 signatures (Most recent: 20 May 2026) Tabled by: Ian Byrne (Labour - Liverpool West Derby) That this House calls for the Public Office (Accountability) Bill, better known as the Hillsborough Law, to be passed in full as one of the first Acts of the new Parliamentary session; notes with concern the lack of progress on the Bill since the postponed Report Stage and Third Reading … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
28 Apr 2026, 1:25 p.m. - House of Commons " The question is, as on the Order Paper Emma Lewell-Buck. Paper Emma Lewell-Buck. >> Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I have watched this whole sorry " Emma Lewell MP (South Shields, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Tuesday 19th May 2026
Oral Evidence - Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Defence, and Ministry of Defence Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes - Defence Committee Found: Q327 Emma Lewell: I was more interested in the MOD lessons learned. |
|
Tuesday 28th April 2026
Report - 8th Report - AUKUS Defence Committee Found: Labour; Leyton and Wanstead) Alex Baker (Labour; Aldershot) Lincoln Jopp (Conservative; Spelthorne) Emma Lewell |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 19th May 2026 10 a.m. Defence Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Afghan Data Breach and Resettlement Schemes At 10:30am: Oral evidence Luke Pollard MP - Minister for Defence Readiness & Industry at Ministry of Defence Dominic Wilson - Director General Transformation at Ministry of Defence Major-General Ben Cattermole - Commander Operation LAZURITE & Director Operations Defence Afghan Relocations and Resettlement (DARR) at Ministry of Defence View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 7th July 2026 10 a.m. Defence Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 9th June 2026 10 a.m. Defence Committee - Oral evidence Subject: One-off Session on Ukraine At 10:30am: Oral evidence Professor Kristen Harkness - Director of the Institute for the Study of War and Strategy at University of St Andrews Professor Michael Clarke - Visiting Professor at King’s College London Orysia Lutsevych - Head of the Ukraine Forum at Chatham House View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 24th June 2026 1:50 p.m. Defence Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 23rd June 2026 10 a.m. Defence Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 14th July 2026 2:50 p.m. Defence Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |