Points of Order Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Tuesday 18th April 2017

(7 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Emily Thornberry Portrait Emily Thornberry (Islington South and Finsbury) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Is it in order for the Secretary of State, while refusing to answer the challenge of a televised debate, to use the opportunity of a statement to make the most extraordinary claims? Perhaps the biggest was that he was unaware of Labour’s position on this matter. We have made it abundantly clear that the way we should have proceeded was for UN inspectors to establish beyond doubt who was responsible and challenge the international community, including the Russians, to take multilateral action against the perpetrator, who is presumably Mr Assad.

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What I would say to the right hon. Lady off the top of my head is that unawareness, whether real or proclaimed, is not disorderly. Proceedings have been orderly. Some people may feel better informed, others may not, but the right hon. Lady, who has considerable experience, both of this place and of pleading her case in the courts, has made her own point with her own eloquence in her own way, and it is on the record.