To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
18 Mar 2026 - Student Loans - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 262 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 266
Division Vote (Commons)
18 Mar 2026 - Fuel Duty - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 252 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 259
Division Vote (Commons)
18 Mar 2026 - Higher Education Fees - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 19 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 98
Written Question
Childcare: Finance
Thursday 12th March 2026

Asked by: Elsie Blundell (Labour - Heywood and Middleton North)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether the Government has considered piloting or introducing an exemption to childcare funding rules where a relative is a registered childminder meeting all regulatory requirements.

Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities)

Parents are free to choose the childcare that is right for them and their children, and childminders are not prevented from caring for related children.

However, the restriction on funding relatives is set out in the Childcare Act 2006. Section 18(4) of this Act specifically excludes care provided for a child by a parent or other relative.

Allowing childminders to receive funding for looking after related children would not be an effective use of public money and may have a negative impact on the viability of existing childcare businesses.

A local authority can choose to fund a childminder providing childcare for a related child, but this would have to be from local authority funds independent of the dedicated schools grant.

Although childminders cannot receive entitlements funding for related children, flexibilities within staff to child ratios can be used to enable childminders who are caring for related children to avoid limiting the income they can earn.



Written Question
Childcare: Finance
Thursday 12th March 2026

Asked by: Elsie Blundell (Labour - Heywood and Middleton North)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether the Department plans to review the eligibility criteria for government-funded childcare for children cared for by qualified and Ofsted-registered relatives.

Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities)

Parents are free to choose the childcare that is right for them and their children, and childminders are not prevented from caring for related children.

However, the restriction on funding relatives is set out in the Childcare Act 2006. Section 18(4) of this Act specifically excludes care provided for a child by a parent or other relative.

Allowing childminders to receive funding for looking after related children would not be an effective use of public money and may have a negative impact on the viability of existing childcare businesses.

A local authority can choose to fund a childminder providing childcare for a related child, but this would have to be from local authority funds independent of the dedicated schools grant.

Although childminders cannot receive entitlements funding for related children, flexibilities within staff to child ratios can be used to enable childminders who are caring for related children to avoid limiting the income they can earn.



Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 11 Mar 2026
Oral Answers to Questions

"Many women across the country living with endometriosis are forced to withstand immense challenges in the workplace, often culminating in them having to curtail their ambitions or leave employment entirely. That is because some workplaces are not putting in place proper protections to support working women, who frankly deserve better. …..."
Elsie Blundell - View Speech

View all Elsie Blundell (Lab - Heywood and Middleton North) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 11 Mar 2026
Oral Answers to Questions

"1. What steps she is taking with Cabinet colleagues to help protect the rights of women with endometriosis in the workplace. ..."
Elsie Blundell - View Speech

View all Elsie Blundell (Lab - Heywood and Middleton North) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Division Vote (Commons)
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 282 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 292
Division Vote (Commons)
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 161
Division Vote (Commons)
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context
Elsie Blundell (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 279 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 283