Alleged Spying Case: Role of Attorney General’s Office

Debate between Ellie Reeves and Harriet Cross
Thursday 23rd October 2025

(1 week, 4 days ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Ellie Reeves Portrait The Solicitor General
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The Government are disappointed that this prosecution did not go ahead. If the previous Conservative Government had tightened our laws in relation to national security before 2022, we may not have found ourselves in this position. It is absolutely right that there was no political interference with the witness evidence. It is an important part of our constitution that criminal prosecutions are done without political interference.

Harriet Cross Portrait Harriet Cross (Gordon and Buchan) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

When was the Attorney General informed that the case was going to collapse?

Ellie Reeves Portrait The Solicitor General
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The Attorney General will be setting out his evidence to the Joint Committee next Tuesday.