All 1 Eleanor Smith contributions to the Census (Return Particulars and Removal of Penalties) Act 2019

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Mon 7th Oct 2019
Census (Return Particulars and Removal Of Penalties) Bill [Lords]
Commons Chamber

3rd reading: House of Commons & Committee: 1st sitting: House of Commons

Census (Return Particulars and Removal Of Penalties) Bill [Lords] Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Census (Return Particulars and Removal Of Penalties) Bill [Lords]

Eleanor Smith Excerpts
3rd reading: House of Commons & Committee: 1st sitting: House of Commons
Monday 7th October 2019

(5 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Census (Return Particulars and Removal of Penalties) Act 2019 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Committee of the whole House Amendments as at 7 October 2019 - (7 Oct 2019)
Eleanor Smith Portrait Eleanor Smith (Wolverhampton South West) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Why is the ONS ignoring the legal status of the Sikhs as an ethnic group and continuing to discriminate against them by refusing to include a tick box despite evidence of cross-party support?

Christian Matheson Portrait Christian Matheson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is Labour’s hope that the ONS will listen to the case put by my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Edgbaston, and I will deal with that in a moment.

The campaign for an ethnic tick box turns on the recognition of Sikhs as an ethnic community by law, and many in the Sikh community feel that individuals should be able to identify as ethnically Sikh in the next census to ensure a more accurate picture of the community. The primary concern, as my hon. Friend stated, is that public bodies do not currently have enough information about Sikhs. I found the homelessness figures to be shocking and was unaware of the situation. More data would help inform the approach of the education, health, local government and business sectors towards the Sikh community. It is important to target services effectively, so data about such minority groups is vital because underreporting could allow discrimination to go unnoticed.

Labour fully supports the campaign by my hon. Friend and the all-party parliamentary group, which has been tireless and persuasive in pressing for a change so that the census includes a section on ethnic identity, with an option to choose being a Sikh. Indeed, to respond to my hon. Friend the Member for Wolverhampton South West (Eleanor Smith), I believe that there is not only legal precedent in this matter, but a pending court case that will seek a judicial review of the ONS’s decision.

However, in conversations with the Minister outside the Chamber, he convinced me that this particular Bill might not be the appropriate vehicle for that matter to be addressed, so I ask him to address that concern in his contribution. I understand that today’s Bill is concerned only with the section of the census relating to sexuality and gender identity. Will the Minister explain how the way in which new clause 2 is worded may cause difficulty for that section? Will he also address the view presented by the ONS that questions on gender, identity and sexual orientation may not be included if new clause 2 is passed at this stage?

I hope that the ONS listens carefully to the campaign of my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Edgbaston, because the discussions around having a Sikh tick box within the overall question on ethnicity may have been going on for 20 years and will not go away anytime soon. The sooner we can resolve the matter to the satisfaction of the Sikh community, the sooner we can get things right.