All 2 Debates between Ed Miliband and Angus Robertson

Syria and the Use of Chemical Weapons

Debate between Ed Miliband and Angus Robertson
Thursday 29th August 2013

(11 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Ed Miliband Portrait Edward Miliband
- Hansard - -

I am going to make a bit more progress.

Angus Robertson Portrait Angus Robertson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Ed Miliband Portrait Edward Miliband
- Hansard - -

I will give way.

Angus Robertson Portrait Angus Robertson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the right hon. Gentleman confirm that in advance of previous conflicts, such as the intervention in Afghanistan, political parties in the House were briefed in detail, and on Privy Council terms, on the nature of the evidence on why there should be intervention? Can he confirm that there have been no such briefings in advance of this vote?

Ed Miliband Portrait Edward Miliband
- Hansard - -

I have had the benefit of briefings with the Prime Minister, but I am sure that he, having heard the hon. Gentleman’s intervention, will want to extend that facility to him and other minority parties.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973

Debate between Ed Miliband and Angus Robertson
Monday 21st March 2011

(13 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Ed Miliband Portrait Edward Miliband
- Hansard - -

It is hard to calibrate the different regimes, but I believe that Colonel Gaddafi’s threat to hundreds of thousands of people in Benghazi and elsewhere puts him in a particular category. I also say to my hon. Friend that this is not a perfect world and, in the end, we have to make a judgment about what can be done. This is something that I think can be done.

Angus Robertson Portrait Angus Robertson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Ed Miliband Portrait Edward Miliband
- Hansard - -

I want to make some more progress. I will try to give way before the end of my speech, but I am conscious that many people want to speak in the debate.

If we succeed, we will have sent a signal to many other regimes that, in the face of democratic protest and the demand for change, it is simply not acceptable to turn to methods of repression and violence. And yet, if this pragmatic case for action in Libya is to stand and win support, it is all the more important that we speak out firmly, without fear or favour, against repression wherever we find it. In Bahrain, where the regime has apparently fired tear gas into a hospital, and in Yemen, where the murder of innocent civilians has taken place, we must be on the side of people and against the forces of repression wherever we find them.

We should address the longer-running issues affecting security and human rights in the middle east, particularly Israel-Palestine, where we must show that we can advance the peace process, and we must put pressure on our American allies to do so. We cannot be silent on these issues, either as a country or as an international community.