All 2 Debates between Edward Leigh and Ann Coffey

Statutory Sex and Relationships Education

Debate between Edward Leigh and Ann Coffey
Tuesday 31st January 2017

(7 years, 3 months ago)

Westminster Hall
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Westminster Hall is an alternative Chamber for MPs to hold debates, named after the adjoining Westminster Hall.

Each debate is chaired by an MP from the Panel of Chairs, rather than the Speaker or Deputy Speaker. A Government Minister will give the final speech, and no votes may be called on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Edward Leigh Portrait Sir Edward Leigh (in the Chair)
- Hansard - -

Order. Could the hon. Lady conclude her remarks?

Ann Coffey Portrait Ann Coffey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We need to give more young people the chance to do that. Thank you, Sir Edward.

Serious Crime Bill [Lords]

Debate between Edward Leigh and Ann Coffey
Monday 23rd February 2015

(9 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Edward Leigh Portrait Sir Edward Leigh
- Hansard - -

If the hon. Lady thinks that such abortions are illegal under the 1967 Act, what possible objection could there be to making that explicit in law?

Ann Coffey Portrait Ann Coffey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

If the hon. Gentleman will wait, I am coming to that point.

The statement the hon. Member for Congleton proposes would sit alongside the existing seven grounds for termination in the 1967 Act, but of course the sex of the foetus can be a factor in causing so much distress for the woman that she meets the existing medical criteria for a termination. The British Medical Association supplied two case studies that demonstrated how that can occur. In both cases, gender was a key factor in affecting the state of mind of the pregnant woman and her wish not to continue the pregnancy. It is not clear how new clause 1, if added to the Bill, would affect the decision of doctors on the legal grounds on which they might agree a termination, if at all. It would inevitably be subject to legal challenges that would, I believe, dilute the clarity of the 1967 Act. As far as I am aware, there is no evidence that doctors are granting terminations to women who do not meet the medical grounds laid down in the Abortion Act 1967.