All 2 Debates between David Wright and John Hayes

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between David Wright and John Hayes
Monday 21st March 2011

(13 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Hayes Portrait Mr Hayes
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman knows that local authorities will retain their statutory duty for all but careers, and the all-age service will make an immense difference in social mobility. It will give people a chance to fulfil their potential and be the best they can be. I do not want to be excessively critical, but I have to say that in many cases Connexions just did not do that adequately.

David Wright Portrait David Wright (Telford) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

19. Whether children in care will automatically be eligible for funding through the scheme to replace education maintenance allowance.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between David Wright and John Hayes
Monday 7th February 2011

(13 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Hayes Portrait The Minister for Further Education, Skills and Lifelong Learning (Mr John Hayes)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We plan to allocate the new funding replacing the education maintenance allowance in line with the usual timetable for overall funding allocations for schools and colleges, which will be made in the spring.

David Wright Portrait David Wright
- Hansard - -

The real concern is about transitional arrangements. Will the Minister explain what discussions he has had with colleges about the transitional arrangements, particularly for students who have already started their course and want to continue receiving funding support while they carry on with it?

John Hayes Portrait Mr Hayes
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman is right that transitional arrangements are important. We are in discussions with colleges and their representative bodies to ensure that there is not the kind of problem that he identifies. We are determined to allocate these resources in the way that addresses disadvantage most cost-effectively and ensures that the worse-off are not still worse off as a result of the changes.