Debates between David Simmonds and Damian Hinds during the 2019 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between David Simmonds and Damian Hinds
Monday 29th April 2024

(1 day, 20 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Damian Hinds Portrait Damian Hinds
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Member is of course right that the lead is taken by a different Department, but we are very conscious of the pressures, including from social media, in relation to pornography, deepfake and nudification, as she rightly identifies, and we are working right across Government to make sure those pressures can be eased.

David Simmonds Portrait David Simmonds (Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

T6. Bearing out feedback from my two excellent local Conservative councils, a recent report from the organisation London Councils highlights a 4.3% drop in the number of pupils in schools in Hillingdon. At a time of falling numbers on rolls in outer London, will my hon. Friend commit to work with our schools and local authorities to promote the opportunities for more inclusion for SEND pupils in mainstream schools?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between David Simmonds and Damian Hinds
Thursday 22nd July 2021

(2 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
David Simmonds Portrait David Simmonds (Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner) (Con)
- Hansard - -

What recent estimate that body has made of the total cost of the restoration and renewal of the Palace of Westminster.

Damian Hinds Portrait Damian Hinds (East Hampshire)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Sponsor Body, supported by the Delivery Authority, is currently developing the detailed plan that will for the first time give an accurate sense of the costs and timescales and the full detail of the work needed for restoration and renewal. It will be put before both Houses for a decision before works commence. Securing best value for money is fundamental.

David Simmonds Portrait David Simmonds [V]
- Hansard - -

Given that the House has debated the subject numerous times, supported the Joint Committee’s 2016 proposal and passed the Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Act 2019, does my right hon. Friend agree that continually re-examining the scope and cost of the project increases the risk that we are not making our national Parliament fit for purpose and runs the risk of us having our own Notre-Dame moment with our beautiful and historic building?

Damian Hinds Portrait Damian Hinds
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is right to mention the terrible fire at Notre-Dame, which serves as a reminder to us all of the risk to our great heritage assets. He is also right that putting off works tends to increase costs eventually, so I agree entirely about the time sensitivity of action and thank him for his timely reminder.